pure air
#33
Originally posted by craigrrrp
oh yea..... and i now have a headache......thanks guys
oh yea..... and i now have a headache......thanks guys
#35
**** all i wanted
damn all i wanted to know what would happen if you put pure O2 into an engine. i just wanted to know if it was possible.
then the whole NOS thing came up and so i asked about propane. no one knows anything about the propane so that is alight. so now i am going to end all this bull **** about people getting mad about what NOS and its chemical solutions do to a car's engine.
NOS will add as much power as you want. from 20hp to 200hp or whatever. IT IS DANGEROUS. we kinda figured that out. if you didnt know this then dont stick a bottle in your car. IF the NOS has 36% O2 then it will give you the above stated gains for brief seconds. thats right anymore than that your car WILL blow its self up, unless you really modify the **** out of it. who cares how the damn thing makes so much power even if they dont realse all the info and that other articles say something else. it works and let it be. you run the risk of using it.
there nothing more. no more arguing. i was just wondering about it and it seems people like to make you feel dumb if you know nothing about chemistry. so sorry for not knowing that is why i came here.
and no more arguing.
then the whole NOS thing came up and so i asked about propane. no one knows anything about the propane so that is alight. so now i am going to end all this bull **** about people getting mad about what NOS and its chemical solutions do to a car's engine.
NOS will add as much power as you want. from 20hp to 200hp or whatever. IT IS DANGEROUS. we kinda figured that out. if you didnt know this then dont stick a bottle in your car. IF the NOS has 36% O2 then it will give you the above stated gains for brief seconds. thats right anymore than that your car WILL blow its self up, unless you really modify the **** out of it. who cares how the damn thing makes so much power even if they dont realse all the info and that other articles say something else. it works and let it be. you run the risk of using it.
there nothing more. no more arguing. i was just wondering about it and it seems people like to make you feel dumb if you know nothing about chemistry. so sorry for not knowing that is why i came here.
and no more arguing.
#36
Re: **** all i wanted
Originally posted by 1chance
damn all i wanted to know what would happen if you put pure O2 into an engine. i just wanted to know if it was possible.
there nothing more. no more arguing. i was just wondering about it and it seems people like to make you feel dumb if you know nothing about chemistry. so sorry for not knowing that is why i came here.
and no more arguing.
damn all i wanted to know what would happen if you put pure O2 into an engine. i just wanted to know if it was possible.
there nothing more. no more arguing. i was just wondering about it and it seems people like to make you feel dumb if you know nothing about chemistry. so sorry for not knowing that is why i came here.
and no more arguing.
If it makes you feel better, I found this on the net, just a quote from an edmunds column.
"Finally, AEH inquired about the use of pure oxygen in engines. "Why not bleed pure oxygen into the engine instead of nitrous oxide?" Unlike nitrous oxide, pure oxygen IS highly combustible. If a compressed tank of oxygen was in a vehicle, and that vehicle was involved in an accident, well, let's just say that going fast would be the least of your worries. "
So don't worry you are not the first person to wonder about this concept. Another thing you should be aware of is, your idea is completely valid, a man by the name of Stirling built an engine that ran on pure oxygen and diesel. Check out the link below.
http://www.subsim.com/ssr/frank1.html
Sometimes the best ideas are the craziest ones.
Peace
Stocker
#37
Originally posted by PseudoRealityX
Please explain how a Desiel engine works then...since it doesnt have a spark.
Yeah, for sure it wasn't that they were on fire. Definately not.
Please explain how a Desiel engine works then...since it doesnt have a spark.
Yeah, for sure it wasn't that they were on fire. Definately not.
Number #2: The official cause of death for those poor guys was poisoning. They actually were not burned bad at all. They were killed by the poisons that built up in the atmosphere. I know this because I actually read a book about it instead of just watching the movie.
#38
no doubt
this is a great converstation but people are getting a little too heated about who is right that is all. so everyone just cool down. this is something that, i believe, should be talked about since there is alot of people seeing the movie "Fast and the Furious" and adding nos to their cars and could getting themsleves into alot of trouble. pushing the botton is more than extra power to the wheels.
stocker dont worry about making me feel dumb...i got through chemistry-barely. just no more arguing.
stocker dont worry about making me feel dumb...i got through chemistry-barely. just no more arguing.
#39
really
what book did you read. cuz that is kinda wierd that those guys died of posioning. that is really wierd considering the extreme temos they went through. that is really wierd. oh you know the Challenger that exploded. the reason that they died was from drowning?
#40
Originally posted by Sir Nuke
Obviously YOU have never seen someone screw up and put oil or grease on an OXYGEN cylinder to lubircate the threads of the valve....then open the valve only to have it explode in their face....don't say it can't happen....it has.
Obviously YOU have never seen someone screw up and put oil or grease on an OXYGEN cylinder to lubircate the threads of the valve....then open the valve only to have it explode in their face....don't say it can't happen....it has.
#41
Re: really
Originally posted by 1chance
what book did you read. cuz that is kinda wierd that those guys died of posioning. that is really wierd considering the extreme temos they went through. that is really wierd. oh you know the Challenger that exploded. the reason that they died was from drowning?
what book did you read. cuz that is kinda wierd that those guys died of posioning. that is really wierd considering the extreme temos they went through. that is really wierd. oh you know the Challenger that exploded. the reason that they died was from drowning?
1. The escape hatch mechanism, which took over 30 seconds to open in good conditions and required men on the outside and inside acting together to get it open. A side note is that earlier designs used explosive charges. After one of the astronauts (his name escapes me) blew his hatch and sank his capsule they decided to change that. There is still a debate about whether the astronaut actually blew the hatch or it malfunctioned. The spacecraft ended up at the bottom of the sea (I think they recovered it recently).
2. The environmental oxygen was reduced drastically. To prevent a flash fire like this from ever happening again.
#43
Originally posted by kc5zom
Sir Nuke I cannot even begin to understand what you mean by that? How could putting grease or oil on a thread make an oxygen cylinder explode?
Sir Nuke I cannot even begin to understand what you mean by that? How could putting grease or oil on a thread make an oxygen cylinder explode?
if you doubt it....go to ANY welding supply house worth dealing with....or talk to a welder....ask them what happens when or IF they were to use or put oil/greases on the oxygen bottle threads or on their regulators...or any part of the apparatus....they will tell you...it will EXPLODE. and it has NOTHING to do with any other ignition source.
#44
Re: Re: really
Originally posted by kc5zom
1. The escape hatch mechanism, which took over 30 seconds to open in good conditions and required men on the outside and inside acting together to get it open. A side note is that earlier designs used explosive charges. After one of the astronauts (his name escapes me) blew his hatch and sank his capsule they decided to change that. There is still a debate about whether the astronaut actually blew the hatch or it malfunctioned. The spacecraft ended up at the bottom of the sea (I think they recovered it recently).
1. The escape hatch mechanism, which took over 30 seconds to open in good conditions and required men on the outside and inside acting together to get it open. A side note is that earlier designs used explosive charges. After one of the astronauts (his name escapes me) blew his hatch and sank his capsule they decided to change that. There is still a debate about whether the astronaut actually blew the hatch or it malfunctioned. The spacecraft ended up at the bottom of the sea (I think they recovered it recently).
#45
Re: Re: Re: really
Originally posted by Sir Nuke
the Astronauts name was Gus Grissom and we are talking about a Mercury mission now...NOT apollo, gus grissom sank his capsule LONG before an Apolo mission ever left the ground.
the Astronauts name was Gus Grissom and we are talking about a Mercury mission now...NOT apollo, gus grissom sank his capsule LONG before an Apolo mission ever left the ground.
As to that oil reaction thing I looked that up. It requires a pressurized oxygen source, not just pure oxygen. Hence not using it in regulators and such. I asked my grandfather, who happens to be a welder, and he thought someone would have to be a real dumbass to actually have done that. It is pretty clearly marked on just about everything on his torch system. The ignition source in this example would be pressure. Putting oil in an environment of pure oxygen will not cause a combustion reaction at normal pressures.
Just so I don't hear anything else on this the reaction would be similar to that of a diesel. At a certian pressure the reaction is allowed to proceed. Pressure itself is pent up energy waiting to be released.