AEM vs. INJEN resolution
#16
You have a choice to read this tread or not. The subject tells you what it is about so you can have a choice to open or not. It is your fault that you had to read this.
#17
Re: AEM vs. INJEN resolution
Originally posted by RHAGEL
For all you people who cannot decide which is better, AEM or Injen, I have a real answer. I went up to AEM in Hawthorn CA and spoke with the tech support guy, Robert Green. I asked him about development of a CAI such as the ones made by Injen or K&N. He said that they had a prototype for the CAI but found that it actually made LESS hp than the SRI. Why you ask? The CAI pipe being longer, causes the air to be pulled through the intake at a position farther from the engine. Physics tells us that the rate of flow is less, the farther it has to travel. On top of that, since there are more bends in the pipes, the air tends to technically get warmer, because of friction. So there it is. Hopefully it is solved. This info is not true for all cars though, only the pro and maybe some others.
For all you people who cannot decide which is better, AEM or Injen, I have a real answer. I went up to AEM in Hawthorn CA and spoke with the tech support guy, Robert Green. I asked him about development of a CAI such as the ones made by Injen or K&N. He said that they had a prototype for the CAI but found that it actually made LESS hp than the SRI. Why you ask? The CAI pipe being longer, causes the air to be pulled through the intake at a position farther from the engine. Physics tells us that the rate of flow is less, the farther it has to travel. On top of that, since there are more bends in the pipes, the air tends to technically get warmer, because of friction. So there it is. Hopefully it is solved. This info is not true for all cars though, only the pro and maybe some others.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)