Which one would you pick ?
February-25th-2002, 09:08 PM
#31
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,122
Re: Re: Re: Do you really have to list the H****'s
Originally posted by Makaveli
As for those cars.... don't know, go for the ITR I guess, but why not an Eclipse? Eclipse Spyder
GET an Eclipse!!!
As for those cars.... don't know, go for the ITR I guess, but why not an Eclipse? Eclipse Spyder
GET an Eclipse!!!
It is the 21st century equivalent of the Datsun 280ZX- a heavy, soft boulevard cruiser gussied up to look like a sports car. Like the 280ZX, it is only a shadow of the lighter, fastier, sportier, quicker, much cooler car it replaced
All IMHO of course. Am I making myself look old by making this comparison?
February-26th-2002, 04:38 PM
#33
"Dirty Dee"
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 529
Re: Re: Re: Re: Do you really have to list the H****'s
Originally posted by carguycw
Maybe the Eclipse didn't make the list because it is not a sporty car
It is the 21st century equivalent of the Datsun 280ZX- a heavy, soft boulevard cruiser gussied up to look like a sports car. Like the 280ZX, it is only a shadow of the lighter, fastier, sportier, quicker, much cooler car it replaced
All IMHO of course. Am I making myself look old by making this comparison?
Maybe the Eclipse didn't make the list because it is not a sporty car
It is the 21st century equivalent of the Datsun 280ZX- a heavy, soft boulevard cruiser gussied up to look like a sports car. Like the 280ZX, it is only a shadow of the lighter, fastier, sportier, quicker, much cooler car it replaced
All IMHO of course. Am I making myself look old by making this comparison?
February-26th-2002, 05:13 PM
#34
"Dirty Dee"
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 529
Originally posted by PseudoRealityX
The new Eclipse is an overweight pig of a car that was designed for people who dont care about a car's performance, and want to feel torque.....aka, older americans.
The new Eclipse is an overweight pig of a car that was designed for people who dont care about a car's performance, and want to feel torque.....aka, older americans.
February-26th-2002, 10:18 PM
#37
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,122
Originally posted by PseudoRealityX
The 280Z was a BAD successor to the 240 and 260Z SPORTS cars, when they built it to be more "comfy" and appeal to people who wanted a more "practical" car.
The 280Z was a BAD successor to the 240 and 260Z SPORTS cars, when they built it to be more "comfy" and appeal to people who wanted a more "practical" car.
February-27th-2002, 12:23 AM
#38
Likwidated
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Canada (formerly Yugoslavia)
Posts: 2,159
Yeah, but you can't knock the looks of the Eclipse...
And they're certainly in the range that the guy was looking at. And they ARE sporty, especially when compared to Civics and Accords.....
And they're certainly in the range that the guy was looking at. And they ARE sporty, especially when compared to Civics and Accords.....
March-7th-2002, 06:20 PM
#42
Protege God
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,183
Originally posted by Zerostatic
A lot of you guys are biased because you've got mazda's. The type-R is the obvious best buy of the group.
A lot of you guys are biased because you've got mazda's. The type-R is the obvious best buy of the group.
something to think about.......
and I don't think that we are that biased here.......well maybe a little, but I try to be as open minded as possible..........
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)