Intercooler Kits & Turbo Manifolds Done!
#16
Originally posted by B8 Turbo
Turboge,
What brand and number is the turbocharger? What is the engine number and specs? Litre and compression ratio. The valve cover looks exactly like the BPT power plant except the inlet manifold.
Uh....I didn't see a blow-off valve and the AF sensor. This engine doesn't use a MAF sensor? I saw the air filter is at the bottom. Hmmmmm.....interesting.
Turboge,
What brand and number is the turbocharger? What is the engine number and specs? Litre and compression ratio. The valve cover looks exactly like the BPT power plant except the inlet manifold.
Uh....I didn't see a blow-off valve and the AF sensor. This engine doesn't use a MAF sensor? I saw the air filter is at the bottom. Hmmmmm.....interesting.
The engine is a Mazda 1.8, with 8.8:1 compression. Yes it is the exact same but this is the N/A motor.
The blow off valve is not on there because this is a piping jig, the bungs for the o2 sensor and the BOV, along with BAC, and boost will be going on as soon as the BOV comes in.
This particular intake pipe is made for use with a Haltech E6K system which uses a MAP sensor in place of the VAF. There will be standard intake pipes available for stock VAF's.
#17
Originally posted by turboge
Personally I prefer to pop on the turbo to the existing motor. As long as it is in good condition you won't have any more problems with tuning it than you would on a GTX. You will however need the larger injectors.
Personally I prefer to pop on the turbo to the existing motor. As long as it is in good condition you won't have any more problems with tuning it than you would on a GTX. You will however need the larger injectors.
As stock internals, I'm running a tricked up boost of 1 bar on the BPT.
#18
Originally posted by turboge
It is a Garret T3 with a Garret T04E Compressor. Our normal setup is a T3 on both sides.
It is a Garret T3 with a Garret T04E Compressor. Our normal setup is a T3 on both sides.
The engine is a Mazda 1.8, with 8.8:1 compression. Yes it is the exact same but this is the N/A motor.
This particular intake pipe is made for use with a Haltech E6K system which uses a MAP sensor in place of the VAF. There will be standard intake pipes available for stock VAF's.
#20
Originally posted by PseudoRealityX
Ric put down 397whp on STOCK INTERNALS. The internals for the normal BP are the SAME as the BPT, other than the compression ratio. They are just as strong physically. The NA head also flows better.
Ric put down 397whp on STOCK INTERNALS. The internals for the normal BP are the SAME as the BPT, other than the compression ratio. They are just as strong physically. The NA head also flows better.
#22
Originally posted by B8 Turbo
Thanx for this piece of info. With this kind of whp, is Ric running on stand alone fuel management and larger turbo? T3/T4?
Thanx for this piece of info. With this kind of whp, is Ric running on stand alone fuel management and larger turbo? T3/T4?
I run a haltech e6k, works just the same without the built-in ignition coils.
#23
Originally posted by B8 Turbo
If the motor is not built as OEM Turbo, one can't run high boost or else the internals would be fried. What boost are you runnin'?
As stock internals, I'm running a tricked up boost of 1 bar on the BPT.
If the motor is not built as OEM Turbo, one can't run high boost or else the internals would be fried. What boost are you runnin'?
As stock internals, I'm running a tricked up boost of 1 bar on the BPT.
#24
Originally posted by turboge
I've run the BPT engine bone stock with a GT-R turbo up to 30psi without any internal problems. The only problem I ran into was the head, it's a pile of crap from the factory and restricts high rpm flow. This is why people are switching over to the N/A BP-05 series of heads. I recently put on the BP05 head with a port/polish job and port matched my intake manifold and you can SERIOUSLY feel the difference. It pulls past 7000 now.
I've run the BPT engine bone stock with a GT-R turbo up to 30psi without any internal problems. The only problem I ran into was the head, it's a pile of crap from the factory and restricts high rpm flow. This is why people are switching over to the N/A BP-05 series of heads. I recently put on the BP05 head with a port/polish job and port matched my intake manifold and you can SERIOUSLY feel the difference. It pulls past 7000 now.
I also got one question why u using t3t04e and not going t3t04b turbos.
#25
The turbo flows great at 30psi, the head and cams were restricting exhaust flow.
We use T04E because its a lot more efficient and reduces spoolup time. The T04B design is over 20 years old and lacks the technology that modern imports need.
We use T04E because its a lot more efficient and reduces spoolup time. The T04B design is over 20 years old and lacks the technology that modern imports need.
#28
I was shoping for gtx motor i also asked on prices for a gtr turbo and the turbo was over 1200$.I dont get the point to run gtr turbo at 30 psi. It flows steam hot air at tha tboost due to small ar on compresor housing and there is a lot of stress on the motor at the same time. I would rater have nice set up with t3to4b @ 15 psi that will out flow gtr turbo at any bost and put less stress on the motor.
#29
If we were talking about what you wanted then I wouldn't be stating the facts. I'm sorry that you don't want the GT-R turbo but some people have them. The T3/T04B setup is fine for some poeple.... it is a proven fact that the T04E is a superior design.
People work with what they have. I'd like to see your dyno charts at 15psi.
People work with what they have. I'd like to see your dyno charts at 15psi.
#30
Originally posted by blue LEDz
for some odd reason, i think that branden, the one who IS a professional, knows his **** and if you're such an expert, what's the name of YOUR shop?
for some odd reason, i think that branden, the one who IS a professional, knows his **** and if you're such an expert, what's the name of YOUR shop?