Chemical Warfare
February-12th-2003, 02:46 PM
#31
Salt addict
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Niagara Falls Ont.
Posts: 1,201
Originally posted by 90210brandon
Everyone has there price and I can meet it with the *cough* weed. What kind of beer? Are you asking Foxy to come?
Everyone has there price and I can meet it with the *cough* weed. What kind of beer? Are you asking Foxy to come?
Beer?? Molson Canadian Moosehead, actually any Canadian beer would be good. Except for Kokanee, sorry if thats an insult to you, being from B.C. and all, but I gave it a fair chance before I said I didn't like it.
February-12th-2003, 02:54 PM
#32
Thread Killa'
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: k-town, USA
Posts: 326
Originally posted by midnightblue97
Fine, you're from B.C., bring some weed and beer.
Fine, you're from B.C., bring some weed and beer.
February-12th-2003, 03:22 PM
#33
Salt addict
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Niagara Falls Ont.
Posts: 1,201
Originally posted by fossil boy
I think you guys misinterpreted the title - chemical warfare was NOT about recreational activities. And BTW, given your plans, I'd say you have much work to do eliminating the Thermal Signature of your cave entrance - bring duct tape and plastic!
I think you guys misinterpreted the title - chemical warfare was NOT about recreational activities. And BTW, given your plans, I'd say you have much work to do eliminating the Thermal Signature of your cave entrance - bring duct tape and plastic!
February-12th-2003, 03:28 PM
#34
Thread Killa'
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: k-town, USA
Posts: 326
Originally posted by midnightblue97
I'll assume you were joking.
I'll assume you were joking.
Me? I'm jealous, that's all!
February-12th-2003, 05:04 PM
#35
Certified Sick Individual
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Houston, TX.
Posts: 1,141
You guys ever had Shiner Bock up there? Good beer brewed down here in Texas. I'll bring a case of that for asylum in Canada (just not in Quebec 
).
Iraq has had about as large an effect on the rest of the world since the Gulf War as Cuba does today. They aren't really a threat anymore unless they are supporting Al Qaeda. Saddam and Al Qaeda do not really mix well, he does not want sects that may oppose him building power inside his borders, but hey Colon Powell (I've never heard that before, I think its pretty sweet) said so, so it must be true. I believe this because politicians are inherently the most honest people in the world. They wouldn't pander for support when a large number of Americans don't really want a war anyway, and the majority doubt Bush's ability to run one in the first place (but not Colons, because he was so cool in the first one).
By forcing the issue with Iraq we are welcoming Saddam to start assisting Al Qaeda, I sure as hell would, to try and cause as much damage as possible to American interests throughout the world. If we didn't force the issue we could have waited and through diplomatic means eventually gotten Iraq back on track. Instead we have the only President I can ever recall starting two wars in his first term in office. And the first hasn't been all that successful. We didn't capture our two primary targets, Al Qaeda is still operating, and we don't even really control the Afghan region yet.
But hey. The Iraqi's aren't really people, oil is money, and bullets are cheap. So lets get to killing.
).Iraq has had about as large an effect on the rest of the world since the Gulf War as Cuba does today. They aren't really a threat anymore unless they are supporting Al Qaeda. Saddam and Al Qaeda do not really mix well, he does not want sects that may oppose him building power inside his borders, but hey Colon Powell (I've never heard that before, I think its pretty sweet) said so, so it must be true. I believe this because politicians are inherently the most honest people in the world. They wouldn't pander for support when a large number of Americans don't really want a war anyway, and the majority doubt Bush's ability to run one in the first place (but not Colons, because he was so cool in the first one).
By forcing the issue with Iraq we are welcoming Saddam to start assisting Al Qaeda, I sure as hell would, to try and cause as much damage as possible to American interests throughout the world. If we didn't force the issue we could have waited and through diplomatic means eventually gotten Iraq back on track. Instead we have the only President I can ever recall starting two wars in his first term in office. And the first hasn't been all that successful. We didn't capture our two primary targets, Al Qaeda is still operating, and we don't even really control the Afghan region yet.
But hey. The Iraqi's aren't really people, oil is money, and bullets are cheap. So lets get to killing.
February-12th-2003, 07:48 PM
#37
Likwidated
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Canada (formerly Yugoslavia)
Posts: 2,159
Blue LEDz........ the information that you are fed is by the US Army...... now honestly, THINK by using your head and tell me which way will the information be tilted.........
Bush says: IRAQ ===== BAD
US ======= GOOD
Of course Iraq hates US.
How would you feel if for a DECADE your country has been under sanctions and if hundreds of innocent children and elderly were dying each month DIRECTLY due to the sanctions imposed by the US Government.....
Whoever supports the war is either a) dumb
b) ignorant
c) 11 and under
WTC bombing is DIRECTLY related to the US foreign policy.
I mean come on, how do you expect to **** in half of the world's cereal and then expect them to hug you back?
Bush says: IRAQ ===== BAD
US ======= GOOD
Of course Iraq hates US.
How would you feel if for a DECADE your country has been under sanctions and if hundreds of innocent children and elderly were dying each month DIRECTLY due to the sanctions imposed by the US Government.....
Whoever supports the war is either a) dumb
b) ignorant
c) 11 and under
WTC bombing is DIRECTLY related to the US foreign policy.
I mean come on, how do you expect to **** in half of the world's cereal and then expect them to hug you back?
February-12th-2003, 07:50 PM
#38
Likwidated
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Canada (formerly Yugoslavia)
Posts: 2,159
Also Blue, they wouldn't want you to know that when you're attacking Iraq, you're really attacking a country that's been in poverty over the last decade and that can't even keep up with it's own problems let alone worry about attacking the US...
US is yet again violating all charts of rights and INVADING another country, simple as that.....
US is yet again violating all charts of rights and INVADING another country, simple as that.....
February-12th-2003, 10:47 PM
#39
Certified Sick Individual
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Houston, TX.
Posts: 1,141
Originally posted by 90210brandon
What is Shiner Bock. I've never heard of it. I hope it is worth keeping. And hey, lay off Quebec, it's beautiful there. Nice people.
What is Shiner Bock. I've never heard of it. I hope it is worth keeping. And hey, lay off Quebec, it's beautiful there. Nice people.
http://www.shiner.com Spoetzl Brewery
They make another beer called Hefenweiser (not sure if I spelled right) that is really good too.
I wasn't really ragging on the Quebec people. Thats what the
is for. The way I hear you guys up there talk about them they are kind of like we treat Aggies down here (people that go to Texas A&M University).
February-13th-2003, 05:01 AM
#41
Enter the Protege!
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Dover, Delaware
Posts: 266
Again I think it needs to be said that Iraq has put itself in the position it is in.
Makaveli you seem to forget that the sanctions are imposed by the UN not the US. And again why are those sanctions there??? Because there was that little incident when Iraq decided to invade Kuwait. And you want to talk about the poverty level of Iraq and that they cannot help themselves. Well why is that? Because their leader won't let the money come out to help them. Hello they have just as much oil as the Saudis. If they wanted to become this great economic power I do believe they would have it in them to do so. But Saddam is not about giving money to the people or the country to get them out of the poverty level. He uses his people as shields and test subjects and could care less whether they die or not. Saddam would be willing to kill all of his people if he had the one chance to attack the US.
And the WTC event was NOT directly related to US foreign policy. It is because we do not have the same beliefs as they do. They don't like that we are free to do what we want and pray to the god we choose to pray to. They don't like it that there are Americans in Middle Eastern countries when those same countries welcome us there. We are not spreading tyranny throughout the Middle East. They are. They kill and maim their own people. Those people over there are someones brother and sister or daughter or son. Is it fair that we sit back and watch this happen at the same time be threatened with chemical and bio warfare. Isn't that what the world did with Hitler? Just wait and see what he will do and there will be a peaceful end. Yeah there was peace years and years after and after countless millions had died.
Again I know this isn't a popular opinion but oh well its mine.
Makaveli you seem to forget that the sanctions are imposed by the UN not the US. And again why are those sanctions there??? Because there was that little incident when Iraq decided to invade Kuwait. And you want to talk about the poverty level of Iraq and that they cannot help themselves. Well why is that? Because their leader won't let the money come out to help them. Hello they have just as much oil as the Saudis. If they wanted to become this great economic power I do believe they would have it in them to do so. But Saddam is not about giving money to the people or the country to get them out of the poverty level. He uses his people as shields and test subjects and could care less whether they die or not. Saddam would be willing to kill all of his people if he had the one chance to attack the US.
And the WTC event was NOT directly related to US foreign policy. It is because we do not have the same beliefs as they do. They don't like that we are free to do what we want and pray to the god we choose to pray to. They don't like it that there are Americans in Middle Eastern countries when those same countries welcome us there. We are not spreading tyranny throughout the Middle East. They are. They kill and maim their own people. Those people over there are someones brother and sister or daughter or son. Is it fair that we sit back and watch this happen at the same time be threatened with chemical and bio warfare. Isn't that what the world did with Hitler? Just wait and see what he will do and there will be a peaceful end. Yeah there was peace years and years after and after countless millions had died.
Again I know this isn't a popular opinion but oh well its mine.
February-13th-2003, 08:49 AM
#43
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,122
Originally posted by soma
I'd definately have to disagree with this comment....There are more hidden underground weapons/missles in North Dakota than anywhere else in the world.....
I'd definately have to disagree with this comment....There are more hidden underground weapons/missles in North Dakota than anywhere else in the world.....
I laughed for a good 20 minutes after reading this.
February-13th-2003, 12:35 PM
#44
Thread Killa'
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: k-town, USA
Posts: 326
[i] go back to hugging a ******* tree
JasonKilpa, thanks for shedding some light to all the ignorant people that just believe what they see on the news
[/B]
JasonKilpa, thanks for shedding some light to all the ignorant people that just believe what they see on the news
[/B]
2nd, My how broad-minded you are! You've just labelled folks who disagree with killing as "ignorant".
How decidedly un-American; you do not respect the opinions of others and have no regard for the Basic Right of Dissent.
So, if you choose not to uphold the Constitution, then, exactly why do you want War - for the sake of killing? I'd like to see your opinion, if by the matter of fate, you were born in some less-fortunate country, rather than USA.
It's likely you'd be a suicide bomber! It's far easier to hate than to try to understand. And it seems as if you'd rather be "told" what to do, rather than actually questioning authority.
If you do go to Iraq - good luck and be safe. But remember, YOU are representing the USA, and not just your warped version of this country. Popular Vote did not choose Bush; most folks think this War is a bad idea. And the Iraqi people have no choice in their current circumstance. At best, they are followers just like you!
Last edited by fossil boy; February-13th-2003 at 12:48 PM.
