Forced Induction/Nitrous Technical discussions for all power adders - turbos, superchargers, NOS

Which turbo is better

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old October-5th-2002, 04:50 PM
  #1  
Protege Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
Vindication's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Medford, NY
Posts: 48
Vindication is on a distinguished road
Question Which turbo is better

I know of two aftermarket turbos for the Protege but which one is better? The begi kit wich will get you 167.5 hp and 191.5 ft/lbs torque at 6 psi, and the tripoint engineering which will get you 200+ hp and 413 t/lbs torqueat 8 psi.Even if the begi is set up to 8 psi I don't see it reaching those stats. But how true are the tripoint torque stats. Anyway it seems that tripoint outperforms the begi but which is the bettr kit.
Vindication is offline  
Old October-5th-2002, 08:08 PM
  #2  
I Can Be Teh W1N!!!!
 
pr5owner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,870
pr5owner is on a distinguished road
uhh 400+ Tq comming out of the engine..? you can kiss your tranny good bye as well as your engine block
pr5owner is offline  
Old October-5th-2002, 08:14 PM
  #3  
Protege Enthusiast
 
WShade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 61
WShade is on a distinguished road
Tripoint web site advises 166 hp to the wheels. The BEGI numbers are 168 hp to the wheels with less boost. 413 is not an accurate pounds per square inch representation. More than likely metric
WShade is offline  
Old October-5th-2002, 10:20 PM
  #4  
That's me!!
 
StuttersC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 337
StuttersC is on a distinguished road
This issue has been covered several times. Do a search.

The dyno Tripoint uses is not a Dynojet Chassis Dyno. So the numbers might be what they got, it just isn't measured the same way as a Dynojet.

However, there is something to think about with the Tripoint kit. I know of only one sold, the one pictured on the website. On top of that, I have heard that Aerodyne is having business trouble. As well all should know, Aerodyne makes the turbos Tripoint is using. No turbo, no kit.

On top of that, I don't know what all testing Tripoint has done.

The BEGI, or FM turbo is being developed as we speak, there have been ten pre-production kits sold already and the outlook for this kit is better, IMHO, than the Tripoint set-up. So far, I would go with the FM turbo because of the development behind it.

Tripoint is a great company, I just haven't seen anything about their turbo other than what is on the site. Flyin' Miata has actively posted on this board and others concerning the development process of their turbo kit.
StuttersC is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
UrBaNsTyLe55
Parts For Sale or Wanted
3
March-29th-2005 09:32 PM
possum
1st Gen Protege/323/GLC
0
October-26th-2004 01:35 AM
PSI REP.
Parts For Sale or Wanted
7
July-28th-2003 06:40 PM
guitargod
Forced Induction/Nitrous
11
June-30th-2003 03:00 AM
1chance
Forced Induction/Nitrous
3
May-9th-2002 12:24 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Which turbo is better



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:25 PM.