Embarking on a Turbo SOHC 94 Protoge
#16
Originally posted by PseudoRealityX
Due to poor tuning, NOT the lack of an intercooler Jon.
Due to poor tuning, NOT the lack of an intercooler Jon.
#17
Originally posted by PseudoRealityX
Due to poor tuning, NOT the lack of an intercooler Jon.
Due to poor tuning, NOT the lack of an intercooler Jon.
#19
Originally posted by PseudoRealityX
Of course it didn't help, but a lot of novices think that intercoolers are like the most important thing in the world. You can get by without one, or a very small one if you know the other limits of your system. We have a few locals with home-built turbo kits running non-intercooled, usually ~6 lbs. A good friend of mine with a S14 240SX just put down 205rwhp on his non-intercooled setup. A/Fs look good, as does EGT. For his setup right now, there is ZERO need for an intercooler.
Of course it didn't help, but a lot of novices think that intercoolers are like the most important thing in the world. You can get by without one, or a very small one if you know the other limits of your system. We have a few locals with home-built turbo kits running non-intercooled, usually ~6 lbs. A good friend of mine with a S14 240SX just put down 205rwhp on his non-intercooled setup. A/Fs look good, as does EGT. For his setup right now, there is ZERO need for an intercooler.
#21
Originally posted by itzkcatz
Goodluck with your car. Did u install the haltech yourself?
Goodluck with your car. Did u install the haltech yourself?
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by sweetprotege93
Yeah it kind of sucks having a full engine management system that cost me an arm, a leg,... and another arm, and I don't exactly know what I need to do to tune it correctly. Not having access to a dyno also makes it more difficult to know how to tune it correctly. I've pretty much read through the Haltech manual... but I still don't know the best way to tune it. The basic reason why I had so much damage to my pistons was the hot *** air from the turbo. I barely won my motor off of ebay today... so I'll get that in there and get my stuff together.
Yeah it kind of sucks having a full engine management system that cost me an arm, a leg,... and another arm, and I don't exactly know what I need to do to tune it correctly. Not having access to a dyno also makes it more difficult to know how to tune it correctly. I've pretty much read through the Haltech manual... but I still don't know the best way to tune it. The basic reason why I had so much damage to my pistons was the hot *** air from the turbo. I barely won my motor off of ebay today... so I'll get that in there and get my stuff together.
they are **** when it comes to being user friendly
#24
Originally posted by PseudoRealityX
hasn't run it since boost....car ran mid 15s in NA trim, and now has ~40 more rwhp based on the dynos. I'd guess mid to high 14s.
He autocrosses the car quite a bit, but never done a track day.
hasn't run it since boost....car ran mid 15s in NA trim, and now has ~40 more rwhp based on the dynos. I'd guess mid to high 14s.
He autocrosses the car quite a bit, but never done a track day.
SR owns KA-T. hahaha....j/k
I met a guy this weekend with an SR20DET with no intercooler. For some reason he didn't get the stock side mount. From his compressor housing to his intake manifold, he made a pipe with PVC and rubber adapters. It was hard not to laugh.
#25
Originally posted by PseudoRealityX
It's better than nothing, but it's still a crappy vlsd.
And I don't really like the SR20. I'm a fan of the RB series
It's better than nothing, but it's still a crappy vlsd.
And I don't really like the SR20. I'm a fan of the RB series
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)