Exterior/Interior/Audio Discussion for Exterior/Interior Modifications. Sound systems, body kits, etc.

what do you guys think of this amp wiring kit?

Old Oct 15, 2002 | 01:49 PM
  #16  
Monster8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 45
Monster8 is on a distinguished road
thanks

Ok great! thanks, that is all I needed to know! Now I can't wait till it gets here so that I can get it all installed.
Old Oct 15, 2002 | 02:26 PM
  #17  
JAC's Avatar
JAC
Thread Starter
huh?
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 871
From: Caracas,Venezuela
JAC is on a distinguished road
One more thing, how do I run the remote wires to both amps?
Old Oct 15, 2002 | 03:09 PM
  #18  
hihoslva's Avatar
Show Layne some respect
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,458
From: Long Island,NY
hihoslva is on a distinguished road
You can just split the one remote wire near the amps into two.

~HH
Old Oct 15, 2002 | 06:24 PM
  #19  
JAC's Avatar
JAC
Thread Starter
huh?
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 871
From: Caracas,Venezuela
JAC is on a distinguished road
so I can just cut the wire in half??? it sounds kinda ghetto.
Old Oct 15, 2002 | 07:23 PM
  #20  
hihoslva's Avatar
Show Layne some respect
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,458
From: Long Island,NY
hihoslva is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by JAC
so I can just cut the wire in half??? it sounds kinda ghetto.
OMG no! That's not at all what I mean by "splitting" the wire!

Okay - here's an example, assuming you know what butt connectors are:

Run a single remote wire from the HU back to the area where the amps are. Attach a butt connector to a stripped wire end by crimping it on the wire. Then, take TWO short sections of wire (one for each amp), strip the ends, and crimp BOTH wires in the other end of the connector. You now have a split remote wire, that can be used as a turn-on lead for two amps. A more "ghetto" way is just to forget the connector, and twist the wire ends together and tape over them or use shrink-tubing to cover the connection.

You can "split" the wire anywhere you like, but as close to the amps as reasonable is the best way.

*whew*

~HH
Old Oct 15, 2002 | 09:00 PM
  #21  
JAC's Avatar
JAC
Thread Starter
huh?
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 871
From: Caracas,Venezuela
JAC is on a distinguished road
Ok, thanx. I have another Q (sory if I'm a pain in the ***)

I'm still not shure about which 2chanel amp to get for my components, here are the component's specs:
2-way System:
5.25-inch (130 mm) Woofer,
1-inch (25 mm) Aluminum Dome Tweeter
60W Continuous Power Handling
Rec. Amp Power: 25 - 125 Watts
89.5 dB Efficiency @ 1W/1m
FR: 53 Hz - 25 KHz ± 3 dB

My amp options are both PG Tantrums, the 300.2 that puts out 75w rms @ 4omh, and the 250.2 that puts out 60w rms @4ohm.

wich one should I get? what do they mean by rec. amp power, w rms?

thanx
Old Oct 15, 2002 | 10:13 PM
  #22  
Monster8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 45
Monster8 is on a distinguished road
rec. amp power = recommended amplifier power.
w rms, the w is watts and rms stands for root means square (think of rms like continuous power).
Old Oct 15, 2002 | 10:35 PM
  #23  
douggie's Avatar
Protege Enthusiast
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 484
douggie is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by JAC
Ok, thanx. I have another Q (sory if I'm a pain in the ***)

I'm still not shure about which 2chanel amp to get for my components, here are the component's specs:
2-way System:
5.25-inch (130 mm) Woofer,
1-inch (25 mm) Aluminum Dome Tweeter
60W Continuous Power Handling
Rec. Amp Power: 25 - 125 Watts
89.5 dB Efficiency @ 1W/1m
FR: 53 Hz - 25 KHz ± 3 dB

My amp options are both PG Tantrums, the 300.2 that puts out 75w rms @ 4omh, and the 250.2 that puts out 60w rms @4ohm.

wich one should I get? what do they mean by rec. amp power, w rms?

thanx
Both amps would do fine. They put out about more than 60W rms (which matches the speaker specs). I personally would go for the 300.2, so that in the future if you decide to upgrade the speakers, you'll have more flexibiity because of the extra power.

Don't worry about overpowering the speakers by a small margin, it can't do much harm to the speakers.

Last edited by douggie; Oct 15, 2002 at 10:37 PM.
Old Oct 16, 2002 | 04:02 AM
  #24  
hihoslva's Avatar
Show Layne some respect
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,458
From: Long Island,NY
hihoslva is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by douggie


Both amps would do fine. They put out about more than 60W rms (which matches the speaker specs). I personally would go for the 300.2, so that in the future if you decide to upgrade the speakers, you'll have more flexibiity because of the extra power.

Don't worry about overpowering the speakers by a small margin, it can't do much harm to the speakers.
What he ^ said!

~HH
Old Oct 16, 2002 | 12:21 PM
  #25  
JAC's Avatar
JAC
Thread Starter
huh?
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 871
From: Caracas,Venezuela
JAC is on a distinguished road
Thanx guys, I really apreciate it. Have a , it's on me .
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
atila
1st Gen Protege/323/GLC
1
Jun 11, 2004 03:07 PM
sirfei
Exterior/Interior/Audio
14
Apr 11, 2003 12:15 AM
krayziep5
Exterior/Interior/Audio
14
Sep 17, 2002 12:10 AM
SpyGuy
Exterior/Interior/Audio
4
Aug 11, 2002 12:15 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:22 AM.