Supercharger for 3rd Gen
#1
Supercharger for 3rd Gen
Does any one know if any company offers a supercharger for the 3rd Gen? or are in the process of developing one? I searched the site but could not find any info. I would prefer a supercharger Vs Turbo for more power under normal daily driving conditions and occasional auto-x.
#3
Yeah, I just talked to Jackson Racing, and they are not even considering developing one for the Pro because they said that they still have a lot of other cars that they are trying to develope for. Maybe if they get enough request they might consider one, one can only hope. I guess now, my only other option is try to transplant an FSZE.
#4
Same cost or more, more difficult install, and still less low end torque. We need someone to make supercharger kit. I would think that would be easier than a turbo kit since it wouldn't need as much plumbing. An aluminum intake manifold has got to be easier than a cast iron exhaust manifold.
#5
You might consider a turbo if any are available.
A supercharger puts a lot of stress on the crankshaft. Also, low to mid range power is what superchargers are designed for (unless you have a Paxton or Vortec style "glorified turbo" type) Many times a supercharger will die off in the upper RPM, where most 4-cylinders are designed to run. High RPM engine speeds don't do as much harm as people might think...it's low speed "lugging" that can kill a motor.
I am currently looking into turbocharging my '99!
I have a turbo from an 87-88 Thunderbird Turbocoupe (basically a Garrett T3). It will take some time to figue out all the details, if I can even complete it (designing things on your own includes a lot of praying!)
Besides, nothing gives you a better BOOST than a turbo (no pun intended, maybe)...not even nitrous!
A supercharger puts a lot of stress on the crankshaft. Also, low to mid range power is what superchargers are designed for (unless you have a Paxton or Vortec style "glorified turbo" type) Many times a supercharger will die off in the upper RPM, where most 4-cylinders are designed to run. High RPM engine speeds don't do as much harm as people might think...it's low speed "lugging" that can kill a motor.
I am currently looking into turbocharging my '99!
I have a turbo from an 87-88 Thunderbird Turbocoupe (basically a Garrett T3). It will take some time to figue out all the details, if I can even complete it (designing things on your own includes a lot of praying!)
Besides, nothing gives you a better BOOST than a turbo (no pun intended, maybe)...not even nitrous!
#6
I drove Gran Prix GTP with SC-not bad! But it's already has 3.8 liter...
Don't want to turn this tread into turbo vs superhcarger type, but I also drove Saab 9-3 Turbo. Just 185 hp in 3100 lb car....no lag, no wheelspin- it just goes!
Max torgue(about 190 lb/ff) is available from 2100 rpm, what kinda lag we are talking about?
Alex
Don't want to turn this tread into turbo vs superhcarger type, but I also drove Saab 9-3 Turbo. Just 185 hp in 3100 lb car....no lag, no wheelspin- it just goes!
Max torgue(about 190 lb/ff) is available from 2100 rpm, what kinda lag we are talking about?
Alex
#7
Originally posted by PseudoRealityX
however, determing what you want, either a turbo or supercharger should be based on what you want for your car. For me, a turbo would do nothing other than spin my tires as i tried exiting a corner on power when the boost hits. A supercharger (roots type) would be very linear, and therefore controled with throttle inputs a lot easier.
For the majority of street driving, a supercharger is much more beneficial, and a properly sized blower wont give out at high rpm.
however, determing what you want, either a turbo or supercharger should be based on what you want for your car. For me, a turbo would do nothing other than spin my tires as i tried exiting a corner on power when the boost hits. A supercharger (roots type) would be very linear, and therefore controled with throttle inputs a lot easier.
For the majority of street driving, a supercharger is much more beneficial, and a properly sized blower wont give out at high rpm.
#8
Originally posted by Sal's "J"
Exactly, I too have no need for a turbo as I don't street race on a regular basis or drag race where a turbo will be really helpfull. I just want a little more power to make my daily driving a little more "spirited". As what I prefer on a SC, I really like the root type, yes it will put a little more tension on my crankshaft, but the power is more constant where as a spool type acts more like a turbo. Plus the 2.0 is a bigger engine and can probably handle the load a little easier. I guess I'll just keep hoping for one to come out.
Exactly, I too have no need for a turbo as I don't street race on a regular basis or drag race where a turbo will be really helpfull. I just want a little more power to make my daily driving a little more "spirited". As what I prefer on a SC, I really like the root type, yes it will put a little more tension on my crankshaft, but the power is more constant where as a spool type acts more like a turbo. Plus the 2.0 is a bigger engine and can probably handle the load a little easier. I guess I'll just keep hoping for one to come out.
Just my .02 cents.
#9
Originally posted by Kincaid
If you only want more "spirited" daily driving than why not do a I/H/E route? An Injen CAI, FSZE exhaust cam or headers and a 2.25 - 2.5 inch exhaust would do great for what you want.
Just my .02 cents.
If you only want more "spirited" daily driving than why not do a I/H/E route? An Injen CAI, FSZE exhaust cam or headers and a 2.25 - 2.5 inch exhaust would do great for what you want.
Just my .02 cents.
#10
Originally posted by Sal's "J"
Well since there is no supercharger offered as of yet, then that is my only option other than transplanting an FSZE.
Well since there is no supercharger offered as of yet, then that is my only option other than transplanting an FSZE.
Exhaust cam Mazda Motor Sports $136.90
Intake cam Mazda MotorSports $167.10
Injen CAI, $235.61
Custom Catback Exhaust, Around $300
FSZE Replacement:
FSZE 170Hp Engine, $2061 from Corksport
You'll also need a custom ECU to increase the redline for the new engine. No idea on the cost of this let alone if anyone has accomplished this yet.
And an install price of probably in the $300 range.
All prices in USD.
So overall the CAMs, Intake and Exhaust approach is much more cost-effective.
Again, just my .02.
#11
Taking into consideration "bang for a buck"-cams +bolt ons are more cost effective indeed-they will give aroung 20hp for $60 per hp.
FS-ZE.....would be around $80 per hp+possible emission concerns.I did not take into account freight and time with undriveable car.
Alex
FS-ZE.....would be around $80 per hp+possible emission concerns.I did not take into account freight and time with undriveable car.
Alex
#12
Originally posted by PseudoRealityX
ok, first of all......cams and bolt ons are only gonna net 150 crank hp on a FS motor. Thats right around 135 to the wheels, give or take 5. Next, the cams are gonna kill your hopes at being emissions legal.
ok, first of all......cams and bolt ons are only gonna net 150 crank hp on a FS motor. Thats right around 135 to the wheels, give or take 5. Next, the cams are gonna kill your hopes at being emissions legal.
Lol. I forgot about emissions laws. We don't have any inspections here. So no worries about that here.
And who have you found that will install an engine for 300 bucks? Id be scared to see his shop.
#13
Originally posted by PseudoRealityX
The FS-ZE also has better internals and higher compression. The FS-ZE will run cleaner than a FS with cams, due to this higher compression, and the more complete burn it allows.
the FS-ZE will also run about 170 crank hp and therefore 140-145 at the wheels. It will also have a much nicer curve, due to, once again the higher compression. Putting an intake and exhaust on this motor will also help it out even more....since it's tuned more. Fuel economy will also be better, due to the more efficient compression.
The FS-ZE also has better internals and higher compression. The FS-ZE will run cleaner than a FS with cams, due to this higher compression, and the more complete burn it allows.
the FS-ZE will also run about 170 crank hp and therefore 140-145 at the wheels. It will also have a much nicer curve, due to, once again the higher compression. Putting an intake and exhaust on this motor will also help it out even more....since it's tuned more. Fuel economy will also be better, due to the more efficient compression.
#14
You're missing the point. The FS-ZE engine, as well as the cams, will make the engine even more high strung, or peaky while only added a small amount of power. A supercharger will boost low and midrange power substantially, and provide excellent linear throttle response. That's what I'd like.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)