Tornado Fuel Saver
October-11th-2004, 09:02 PM
#16
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 239
Originally Posted by Da P-Funk!
From an aerodynamic stand point - laminar flow (smooooooth) is better for reduced resistance and increased air volume efficiency.
does. Keeps the sensor output smooooooth. People that yank it out are stoooooopid.
October-12th-2004, 06:32 AM
#17
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 999
eh. call me stooopid. I did pull it and have not seen any lost performance (or any gain for that matter!).
anyhoo, singh's problem is that he won't work 'with' the system. I am quite sure Ford/GM/etc all get their daily 'crank' letters with descriptions of tornado's and $.10 resistors that double gas mileage ad naseum.
If it is truly a 'New' and 'Improved' head design/mod - then he should have no trouble getting the investors to test/prove/patent the idea.
anyhoo, singh's problem is that he won't work 'with' the system. I am quite sure Ford/GM/etc all get their daily 'crank' letters with descriptions of tornado's and $.10 resistors that double gas mileage ad naseum.
If it is truly a 'New' and 'Improved' head design/mod - then he should have no trouble getting the investors to test/prove/patent the idea.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)