Engine Rattle when Cold - 2001 ES 2L and P5
#121
Originally posted by Guido
The flash reprogram will just not allow the solenoid to energize and the VTCS will not function.
The flash reprogram will just not allow the solenoid to energize and the VTCS will not function.
All changes that effect a vehicles emissions system require approval by the EPA. It is almost impossible to get approval from the EPA to do anything that would actually worsen emissions, the rule is equal to or better (or leave it the frick alone). That is why Mazda was taking so long to release the update.
#122
Thus the problem has not been eliminated completely by reprogramming. It would appear to only reduce the amount of cold start run time that it is active.
The problem is that the actuater is only vacuum linear and the PCM control output would be on or off with no inbetween.
Programming cannot alter the degree of it being on, such as 25%, 50%, 75% etc.
So when active it will still rattle against the plate stops in the manifold.
If the VTCS had an electric feed back driven actuator then the programming could eliminate the problem completely.
It would be able to hold the restrictor plates at say 5% off the stops, it would also have a feed back voltage to the powertrain control module so it knows where it's at. It would also have a desired and actual reading if you had scan tool data.
Our cars do not have that ability.
G.
The problem is that the actuater is only vacuum linear and the PCM control output would be on or off with no inbetween.
Programming cannot alter the degree of it being on, such as 25%, 50%, 75% etc.
So when active it will still rattle against the plate stops in the manifold.
If the VTCS had an electric feed back driven actuator then the programming could eliminate the problem completely.
It would be able to hold the restrictor plates at say 5% off the stops, it would also have a feed back voltage to the powertrain control module so it knows where it's at. It would also have a desired and actual reading if you had scan tool data.
Our cars do not have that ability.
G.
#123
Originally posted by Guido
Thus the problem has not been eliminated completely by reprogramming. It would appear to only reduce the amount of cold start run time that it is active.
G.
Thus the problem has not been eliminated completely by reprogramming. It would appear to only reduce the amount of cold start run time that it is active.
G.
So if we assume that the "valve" is the actual butterfly plates that were replaced, one has to ask why would Mazda then deactivate or reduce the amount of running time of the VTCS after putting a new valve in. My *guess* is that the valve replacement is to address any physical vibration issues, and the ECU reflash is to maybe address fuel metering or timing issues.
I admit this is a guess (especially the fuel metering/timing part), but it just seems like part of the noise cant just be physical vibration. I mean, for the plates to vibrate to make that much noise they would just have to be completely loose in the manifold. The noise really does sound like knocking (light detonation). I know Mazda says in the TSB is "the result of the intentional swirl" caused by the plates, but that's some pretty weird sounding "swirling" air. Maybe they meant to say its the sound the swirling air makes after it detonates in the cylinder
I don't know, I'm just talking out loud in this post I guess, but it seems like Mazda may be attacking this problem in two ways, because it may be a problem with both the physical aspects of the plate(valve) design, and programming issues.
My two cents
#124
Valid point Carlos,
I had thought the same thing because it sounded so much like engine knock. I realized it was only the butterfly valves when I disconnected the VTCS actuator.
The next morning the noise was gone and still is, so not an engine knock, which is good.
If Mazda is replacing the actuator as part of a product service bulletin then I will take my car in for the update. Untill now, they have not released any information that I could get.
I guess we'll have to see what happens.
G.
I had thought the same thing because it sounded so much like engine knock. I realized it was only the butterfly valves when I disconnected the VTCS actuator.
The next morning the noise was gone and still is, so not an engine knock, which is good.
If Mazda is replacing the actuator as part of a product service bulletin then I will take my car in for the update. Untill now, they have not released any information that I could get.
I guess we'll have to see what happens.
G.
#125
Originally posted by Guido
Valid point Carlos,
I had thought the same thing because it sounded so much like engine knock. I realized it was only the butterfly valves when I disconnected the VTCS actuator.
The next morning the noise was gone and still is, so not an engine knock, which is good.
G.
Valid point Carlos,
I had thought the same thing because it sounded so much like engine knock. I realized it was only the butterfly valves when I disconnected the VTCS actuator.
The next morning the noise was gone and still is, so not an engine knock, which is good.
G.
So then that leaves the noise as causable by the plates themselves, and/or by the actual sound of swirling air (which still seems like some weird air sounds, but oh well). Speculation here, but if they actually are putting in a new valve, then maybe its redesigned to swirl the air more quietly.
#126
Originally posted by TheMAN
read the VTCS thread
read the VTCS thread
Could you be more specific with what you are trying to get at please?
#127
Not to put water on this discussion, however, they did not replace any parts on my car. They did reprogram the ECU. I saw the FAX that was sent to the dealer and it looked like it was only instructions on how to update the program in the ECU. I did not get to read the entire FAX, but the tech seems to be saying that the he needed to "fake out" the programming tool to accept the new code. Something about VIN number and Mazda programming numbers. I surmise that the coding tools that Mazda use are VIN number specific. This would take the problem of which code, for which vehicle, in what country, was needed in each car away from the local tech (this is probably a good thing). Since my car is a 2002.5 they would need to over ride the programming sequence to allow a code for a 2003 ECU (or newer) to be put in my car. I would think that to meet US federal emission regulations that the code for each model, year, and engine would be approved and recorded differently. Thus if a change of the ECU (hardware) was needed, the emission code would already be approved for each year. That away the same ECU could be used for several different cars and possibly different engines (one stocking part) and still be custom for each car. This is just my opinion, as I didn’t get to read the entire FAX. However, I am happy with the results.
Bob
Bob
#128
Originally posted by Bob0a
Not to put water on this discussion, however, they did not replace any parts on my car. They did reprogram the ECU. Bob
Not to put water on this discussion, however, they did not replace any parts on my car. They did reprogram the ECU. Bob
I seem to remember some people took their cars in for a fix a while back that I think just consisted of an ECU reflash. Time will tell what the deal is I guess.
#129
I spoke with the same technical contact I've had for the past year and they indicated there there WILL be a replacement valve but it isn't available yet. The TSB is to be released within 30 days. The dealers already have the ECU code which will help. The full fix will be out shortly. One of the techs at the local dealer here already has the full repair on his personal car as a test and indicated it is working.
-edit- The interesting part is for the longest time they indicated the noise was lean burn detonation during cold start emissions. Now the final word I got is the actual butterfly valves in the VTCS system is rattling on the seats when in the closed position. That was my original thought...
-edit- The interesting part is for the longest time they indicated the noise was lean burn detonation during cold start emissions. Now the final word I got is the actual butterfly valves in the VTCS system is rattling on the seats when in the closed position. That was my original thought...
Originally posted by me 3/9/02 back on page 4 What it seems like is that at part throttle accelleration through the suspected RPM range, there is enough vacuum on the VCTS actuator to not open but allow the turbulent airflow through the intake make the plates themselves rattle on the seat. A actuator with a slightly heavier spring may help. As far as engine temp having to be below 149F, that wasn't entirely true. W
Last edited by rodslinger; January-9th-2003 at 09:44 AM.
#131
Originally posted by Bijou-MP5
This is dumb question, but just bare with me guys.
If I want to claim this issues to dealership, do i just tell them i have engine rattle problem? or is there specific service name for it?
damn..i sound really dumb.. but just help me out boys~
This is dumb question, but just bare with me guys.
If I want to claim this issues to dealership, do i just tell them i have engine rattle problem? or is there specific service name for it?
damn..i sound really dumb.. but just help me out boys~
#133
THAT'S what I am waiting for:TSB #
Originally posted by cjb200
I would wait till the TSB is out. That way you can just take the number to the dealership and have them look it up (if they don't know what you're talking about). That's what I plan on doing.
I would wait till the TSB is out. That way you can just take the number to the dealership and have them look it up (if they don't know what you're talking about). That's what I plan on doing.
#134
Re: THAT'S what I am waiting for:TSB #
Originally posted by chuck
Dealer always say : WHAT RATTLE... WE HAVE NO FIX FOR WHAT?
Dealer always say : WHAT RATTLE... WE HAVE NO FIX FOR WHAT?
#135
Re: Re: THAT'S what I am waiting for:TSB #
Originally posted by mnkyboy
YEP! Or "Our hands are tied, we cant do anything, Mazda doesnt have a fix". What ever happen to Customer Service? If somethings wrong, find out what is causing the problem and fix it. Dont wait for someone else to figure it out. Man, is this how all dealers work?? How does Mazda "fix" things, they just make the cars, they dont have anything to do with the consumer after the sale. Can someone explain to me how Mazda gets "fixes" for a car?
YEP! Or "Our hands are tied, we cant do anything, Mazda doesnt have a fix". What ever happen to Customer Service? If somethings wrong, find out what is causing the problem and fix it. Dont wait for someone else to figure it out. Man, is this how all dealers work?? How does Mazda "fix" things, they just make the cars, they dont have anything to do with the consumer after the sale. Can someone explain to me how Mazda gets "fixes" for a car?