Real MS pro dyno results!!
#17
Originally posted by macdaddyslomo
damn...got my hopes up...so how bout it....i guarantee you could sell the **** out of them if you made a turbo manifold for a 1.6L 3rd gen pro???
damn...got my hopes up...so how bout it....i guarantee you could sell the **** out of them if you made a turbo manifold for a 1.6L 3rd gen pro???
http://www.protegeclub.com/forum/sho...threadid=11241
[edit]
Hopefully he WILL sell the **** out of his kits, he's a good guy and he knows what he's doing.
[/edit]
#18
I know this,Man! ...I'm all over those posts...the more the merrier though...competition usually makes prces lower
...besides I've been bugging the crap out of Braden,figured I'd bug someone else
...besides I've been bugging the crap out of Braden,figured I'd bug someone else
#19
Originally posted by macdaddyslomo
I know this,Man! ...I'm all over those posts...the more the merrier though...competition usually makes prces lower
...besides I've been bugging the crap out of Braden,figured I'd bug someone else
I know this,Man! ...I'm all over those posts...the more the merrier though...competition usually makes prces lower
...besides I've been bugging the crap out of Braden,figured I'd bug someone else
#20
Originally posted by PseudoRealityX
Turbo 2L engines with 2.25" cat-backs are NOT ideal.
Turbo 2L engines with 2.25" cat-backs are NOT ideal.
#21
Originally posted by funkdaddysmack
Indeed. I think 2.5-2.75 (if they even bother to make 2.75" exhaust) would be good enough for these engines. I do belive, however 3" and up would be too big for the limited potential of the engine (read: tranny). So without some major tranny work, 3" exhaust would be useless and probably detrimental. I think the general rule of thumb is up to 200 hp 2.25", up to 270 or so 2.5", and any higher than that would be around 3" or so. I need to write those numbers down once I find them again.
Indeed. I think 2.5-2.75 (if they even bother to make 2.75" exhaust) would be good enough for these engines. I do belive, however 3" and up would be too big for the limited potential of the engine (read: tranny). So without some major tranny work, 3" exhaust would be useless and probably detrimental. I think the general rule of thumb is up to 200 hp 2.25", up to 270 or so 2.5", and any higher than that would be around 3" or so. I need to write those numbers down once I find them again.
Keith
#22
We've tested Miatas with both 2.5" and 3" exhaust systems. Below 15 psi, the bigger pipe just made no difference in spoolup or peak power. It's just not needed in that case - there's not enough airflow.
The Protegé exhaust has a spot where it hops over the axle. Putting a 3" pipe in there may be a challenge. Take into account the cost and the extra weight, and bigger may not be the best choice.
Our manifold is a cast log-style, yes. Great for longevity.
Keith
The Protegé exhaust has a spot where it hops over the axle. Putting a 3" pipe in there may be a challenge. Take into account the cost and the extra weight, and bigger may not be the best choice.
Our manifold is a cast log-style, yes. Great for longevity.
Keith
Last edited by Keith@FM; September-5th-2002 at 01:13 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
protejay
1st gen/323/GLC Engine and Drivetrain
20
April-12th-2003 03:51 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)