2.0 Engine.
December-26th-2002, 10:31 AM
#76
2002 RX-7 Spirit 'R'
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Brampton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 872
Originally posted by LOS-323
But you canīt discount scientific theory... I think itīs the basis for coming up with actual experimentation. You have to have some sort of theory (even if not well formulated) before you do experimentation.
But you canīt discount scientific theory... I think itīs the basis for coming up with actual experimentation. You have to have some sort of theory (even if not well formulated) before you do experimentation.
you can't just do experimentation out of nowhere
you have to have some kind of theory....to base your experimentation on.
if there was no theory then there won't be any experiment.
even if the theory was to see what would happen if i connect this with this....
December-26th-2002, 07:56 PM
#77
Im fastr then u think u r
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Toronto IS NOT Canada
Posts: 257
Originally posted by PseudoRealityX
FP's rod ratio is close to what the BP was, and what most honda motors are.
The FS's rod ratio is just AWFUL!!! Its like 1.3 or something nasty like that. I think has a lot to do with it. And cams are the other big thing. And apparently from reading on another board about the World Challange cars, the intake manifold is holding back power bigtime too.
FP's rod ratio is close to what the BP was, and what most honda motors are.
The FS's rod ratio is just AWFUL!!! Its like 1.3 or something nasty like that. I think has a lot to do with it. And cams are the other big thing. And apparently from reading on another board about the World Challange cars, the intake manifold is holding back power bigtime too.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jim-san
Mazda3/Mazdaspeed3
10
May-29th-2015 08:03 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)