97 GTP vs 92 Taurus SHO
#1
97 GTP vs 92 Taurus SHO
3.8L V6 w/ supercharger, dumped exhaust, CAI, "wireS"
vs
3.0L V6 NA with an exhaust and motor mounts.
http://s64.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=0...W3FO27SKWR1PHG
vs
3.0L V6 NA with an exhaust and motor mounts.
http://s64.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=0...W3FO27SKWR1PHG
#5
That's sad. Forced induction and almost an extra liter...
Let's see the Pontiac has, what? 12 valves? pushrods? hydraulic lash adjusters? power-robbing torque converter automatic? You can't polish a turd.
Let's see the Pontiac has, what? 12 valves? pushrods? hydraulic lash adjusters? power-robbing torque converter automatic? You can't polish a turd.
#8
Don't get me started on GM bashing, I used to work for the General. Actually, I worked at a Toyota/GM dealership parts dept. As a result, I have no respect for GM. Whereas toyota actually tries to continuously improve their products (Kaizen, their corporate philosophy), GM just buys the absolute cheapest **** from the cheapest supplier. Period. If it breaks, oh well, it's cheap to replace under warranty, and when it goes out of warranty, hey, it's the customer's problem.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)