Mazda3/Mazdaspeed3 Engine/Drivetrain Modification Discussions for the Mazda3 and MazdaSpeed3

2.0L upgrades worth it?

Old Aug 21, 2007 | 10:20 AM
  #16  
Bujwazay's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 27
Bujwazay is on a distinguished road
I do plan on keeping the car as i have a few years of payments left....and my car is pretty bare bones and cost only 13k so it is a huge difference in price to the speed3. thanks for all of the thoughts though!

i've been reading a lot about SRI's & CAI's and how likely is hydrolock?...it seems like some people say that it will never happen and some say that it's happened to them on a normal rainy day, and is there really a big difference in performance gains/engine sound/ asthetics for a SRI vs. a CAI?
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 11:33 AM
  #17  
KrayzieFox's Avatar
Spam Czar!!
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,315
From: Cedar Falls, Iowa
KrayzieFox is on a distinguished road
Yea 13K and 23K is definitely a big difference there .. the MS3 would cost you double of what you currently pay. Not just the car payment, probably everything .. including insurance, gas, etc.

As far as hydrolock is concerned, you should be safe as long as you don't drive through a bigass puddle. There's no way it can happen just driving through normal rain, cuz your air filter literally has to be SUBMERGED in water for it to happen. Even with a CAI, the filter is still a good 6-7 inches off the ground so the chances of you going through that much water are very very slim.

SRI vs. CAI is really no different unless you plan on doing some heavy modifying. They both give you a slight HP increase of maybe 2-4HP, where the CAI might add an extra 1 or so HP if even. However, the CAI will make a nice swooshing sound and look pretty nice under the hood.
Old Aug 25, 2007 | 07:32 PM
  #18  
shep61487's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 23
From: Boston, MA
shep61487 is on a distinguished road
Less is sometimes more . . .

The thing I like about my 2.0 is that its base. the car doesn't come with all of this electronic safety crap to numb down the driving experience. No ABS, no electronic bakeforce distribution, no traction control. That's the one thing I like about having the 2.0 vs. the 2.3. If I want to lock my wheels up then let me, lol.
Old Aug 25, 2007 | 07:55 PM
  #19  
dentinger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 535
From: burlington, ON....it's west of Toronto
dentinger is on a distinguished road
my '07 2.0 base model has ABS.......

but thats pretty much it.
i love the fact that it doesnt have traction control. makes peeling out, or spinning the tires in the wet/snow way more easier/fun
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dangeo
3rd gen Engine/Drivetrain
2
Feb 8, 2005 06:39 PM
NiXBoY
3rd Gen Protege/MazdaSpeed/P5/MP3
1
Jan 16, 2005 08:51 PM
2nd gen_dx
3rd gen Engine/Drivetrain
3
Feb 4, 2004 05:09 PM
Traveler
3rd gen Engine/Drivetrain
6
May 17, 2002 10:53 AM
atp959
1st gen/323/GLC Engine and Drivetrain
1
Apr 3, 2002 03:27 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:15 AM.