MP5 1/4 Mile Times
March-9th-2002, 08:16 PM
#36
Protege Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 204
Originally posted by QuickSiR
when I did that run I had an AEM CAI and the spare tire removed!!
when I ran the 14.98 I had AEM CAI, Integra TypeR clutch, spare tire and seats removed! On 14" wheels with 195/60ZR14 A520! (front)!
http://quicksir.tracracing.com/SiR_1498.mpg
when I did that run I had an AEM CAI and the spare tire removed!!
when I ran the 14.98 I had AEM CAI, Integra TypeR clutch, spare tire and seats removed! On 14" wheels with 195/60ZR14 A520! (front)!
http://quicksir.tracracing.com/SiR_1498.mpg
end rant
March-9th-2002, 08:44 PM
#37
Protege Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lachenaie
Posts: 40
err. no i dont think that the trac is the problem... because you see tehre have been RACERS of the NHRA and all that that came to napierville and that did THE SAME times that they do in LA or elsewhere... so i dont believe that the trac is in fault...
and there ARE people that does 17 sec with theirs p5 and there are guys that does 15,5 with their SIR
i event saw a guy do 14,8 with a TYPE-R with intake, headers, exhaust so... the DRIVER does the difference dont try to get excuses.
... the trac... pfffff make me laugh!!!
and there ARE people that does 17 sec with theirs p5 and there are guys that does 15,5 with their SIR
i event saw a guy do 14,8 with a TYPE-R with intake, headers, exhaust so... the DRIVER does the difference dont try to get excuses.
... the trac... pfffff make me laugh!!!
March-9th-2002, 08:53 PM
#38
Protege Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 204
Originally posted by 5 Guardian
... the trac... pfffff make me laugh!!!
... the trac... pfffff make me laugh!!!
YOUR CAR DOES NOT RUN 16 FLAT IN THE 1/4!!!! WAKE UP!
March-9th-2002, 09:23 PM
#40
Protege Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 204
guy . . . you're talking to the fastest stock P5 on this site! 16.7, everyone else on here (i believe) has not broken the 17's.
you have to understand that we are having a really hard time with 16.0
oh well . . . good luck in your world.
out.
you have to understand that we are having a really hard time with 16.0
oh well . . . good luck in your world.
out.
March-9th-2002, 09:38 PM
#42
Protege Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 44
Sorry but it's not my fault if you can't get better than 16.7.
It's pointless to continue this conversation. If you can't break the 17s, it's your problem. I CAN AND I DID IT. Thats a fact and we got out slip so we will scan it and post it. As soon has it will be possible.
It's pointless to continue this conversation. If you can't break the 17s, it's your problem. I CAN AND I DID IT. Thats a fact and we got out slip so we will scan it and post it. As soon has it will be possible.
March-9th-2002, 09:43 PM
#43
Protege Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lachenaie
Posts: 40
Originally posted by LooseCannon
why are you using slower cars as an example -
why are you using slower cars as an example -
hmmm im not sure but i think that a TYPE-R is a faster car
and also a SIR
i dont get your point...
and you just wait that quick gets home and he'll post the video of me vs him that i did 16,4
and for the 16flat you will just have to WAIT to this summer
ho and by the way i think that using a G-tech woudlnt be acceptable even if i did the same time with it cus you would say some bullshit like you were in a downhill , your g-tech is not working propelly..
blablablabla.
