General Automotive For other auto manufacturer discussions

Mazda3 Spy-Photo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old January-29th-2003, 12:15 PM
  #31  
Protege Newbie
 
chezterr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 9
chezterr is on a distinguished road
And would someone please tell me where the hell Ford called this a Duratec?
The Duratec name has been in use since at least 1996 if not 1995.... First in the Ford Contour/Mondeo on the 2.5L V6 engine all around the world... Then the 3.0L Duratec engine in the Taurus, Lincoln LS, Jaguar X and S-Type, Ford Escape/Mazda Tribute, etc.....

They have been using these new Duratec 4 cylinder engines over in Europe in the newly redesigned Mondeo in a 2.0L version, they also have 1.8L and 1.8L Turbo Diesel engines that are Duratec's.....

I havent seen any ads for any car using a Duratec engine that actually says it is a Duratec engine... They only state the engine size and the number of valves i.e :

Mercury Cougar 2.5L 24v DOHC All Aluminum V6

Granted the Cougar's Plastic engine cover says DURATEC on it....

Nevertheless... the 2.3L engine in the Ranger, Mazda6i, and soon to be Focus and Protege is a Duratec through and through...

Nikolas
chezterr is offline  
Old January-29th-2003, 01:18 PM
  #32  
Protege Anarchist
 
TheMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 708
TheMAN is on a distinguished road
"Duratec"

Ford's badge engineering at best... since they didn't do **** in the (4 cyl) engine designing process!
TheMAN is offline  
Old January-29th-2003, 04:35 PM
  #33  
Certified Sick Individual
 
kc5zom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Houston, TX.
Posts: 1,141
kc5zom is on a distinguished road
Yeah. Duratec and Zetec are just BS trade names for "Hey, we actually put more than one camshaft in here, aren't we frickin special".

Its a motor through and through. It is only a Duratec if Ford actually decides to call it that. There is no specific Duratec or Zetec technology that is any different from any other manufacturers DOHC technology.
kc5zom is offline  
Old January-29th-2003, 05:31 PM
  #34  
Protege Anarchist
 
TheMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 708
TheMAN is on a distinguished road
Duratec && Zetec && VORTEC != variable_valve_timing

variable_valve_timing == VTEC, VTC, S-VT, VANOS, NeoVVL, VVT-i, VVTL-i, VVC, MIVEC
TheMAN is offline  
Old January-29th-2003, 05:50 PM
  #35  
Salt addict
 
midnightblue97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Niagara Falls Ont.
Posts: 1,201
midnightblue97 is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by 90&00 Protege
The Ford 2.3L (Pinto) block doesn't have balance shafts. The new Mazda 2.3L unit does...they are not the same.
I think the pinto 2.3l engine is the pushrod version like that ised in the Tempo/topaz, and I'm not sure what else. I'd think that at the very least they would have used the sohc 2.3l that they used in the 4cyl MUstang and the Ranger. Which I would assume would be a different block.
midnightblue97 is offline  
Old January-29th-2003, 06:22 PM
  #36  
formerly chastan
 
UCSBgeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: California, USA
Posts: 2,350
UCSBgeek is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by TheMAN
Duratec && Zetec && VORTEC != variable_valve_timing

variable_valve_timing == VTEC, VTC, S-VT, VANOS, NeoVVL, VVT-i, VVTL-i, VVC, MIVEC
nevermind

Last edited by UCSBgeek; January-29th-2003 at 10:12 PM.
UCSBgeek is offline  
Old January-29th-2003, 07:57 PM
  #37  
Certified Sick Individual
 
kc5zom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Houston, TX.
Posts: 1,141
kc5zom is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by midnightblue97

I think the pinto 2.3l engine is the pushrod version like that ised in the Tempo/topaz, and I'm not sure what else. I'd think that at the very least they would have used the sohc 2.3l that they used in the 4cyl MUstang and the Ranger. Which I would assume would be a different block.
Ford and its love affair with the 2.3L. Had both the pushrod and SOHC versions, didn't really care for either.
kc5zom is offline  
Old January-30th-2003, 10:40 AM
  #38  
Protege Newbie
 
spud 23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: chattanooga,TN
Posts: 25
spud 23 is on a distinguished road
I have a 2.3 SOHC ranger and it is very slow. There are many reasons for this: 1. it is a heavy little truck(3,200 lbs.) 2. it has a final drive ratio of 3.45:1 3. it is built like a brick 4. The head design is very inefficient because it's a dual plug head. I have been very satisfied with the little truck except it needs a little more power. It runs very well though.

later,
james

p.s. the name for the block is referred to as the lima block
spud 23 is offline  
Old January-30th-2003, 12:08 PM
  #39  
Chillin' like a Villain
 
RHAGEL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Aliso Viejo, CA
Posts: 160
RHAGEL is on a distinguished road
Its going to look pretty good, needs bigger wheels though. As long as its got power, sign me up.
RHAGEL is offline  
Old January-31st-2003, 03:36 PM
  #40  
Protege Enthusiast
 
P5er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 160
P5er is on a distinguished road
I don't know why a year ago, when Mazda6 was not out yet I heard that it will be one of the quietest cars in it's class compared to BMW 3 series due to it's rigid suspension and .....
new family of engines 2.3 liter was called as one of the smoohtest , vibration free , light , economical just one of the best engines in it's class!!!!
Is Mazda 6 really as quiet as a BMW3?
I don't think so.
And is 2.3 ( same family with Ford's Duratec HE used in european Mondeo, but let's not call it names)really a leader in it's class???
I know that it is a sporty sedan and it's engine (exhaust/intake design) was not tuned up to be really quiet, it's not powerful either like it's 6hp more EURO version and 15hp more Japaneese version.
Which way is Mazda really going?
Luxury = (quieter engine) but less power.
Sporty = (louder engine) but more power.
Where is the sence here, several people have complained that M6 2.3 is not really quiet and smooth like Mazda advertized it.
???
P5er is offline  
Old January-31st-2003, 04:32 PM
  #41  
Protege Anarchist
 
TheMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 708
TheMAN is on a distinguished road
it's quieter and rides smoother than the new camry to me

the hp issue is EMISSIONS
TheMAN is offline  
Old January-31st-2003, 11:32 PM
  #42  
Protege Newbie
 
Gasket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 13
Gasket is on a distinguished road
What about this ?


Gasket is offline  
Old January-31st-2003, 11:35 PM
  #43  
Protege Anarchist
 
TheMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 708
TheMAN is on a distinguished road
that is quite photochopped
TheMAN is offline  
Old February-1st-2003, 02:44 PM
  #44  
Protege Newbie
Thread Starter
 
spammy56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 17
spammy56 is on a distinguished road
Hatch Photo

The top photo of the silver hatch IS the real thing. The bottom one is photoshopped. Someone over at edmunds.com has confermed that this is the real thing but the one coming to America looks a little more aggresive. He also added that we will be surprised how much difference there is between the sedan and the hatch. I can't wait to see a photo of the sedan!
spammy56 is offline  
Old February-1st-2003, 07:30 PM
  #45  
Registered User
 
OPRAKU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: North OC, CA
Posts: 157
OPRAKU is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by P5er
...(I've heard a few people complaining about engine noise on the M6!!!???)
I test drove one the other day and it had no more noise than the previous 626. IMO I like hearing the engine, in case there was something that didn't sound right you'd be able to hear it. Rather than BMW or Merc that are like soundproof bomb-shelters.

Hearing the engine noise annoys people, thus keeping them awake at the wheel.. haha that's my theory on it.
OPRAKU is offline  


Quick Reply: Mazda3 Spy-Photo



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:38 PM.