Gta3
June-20th-2002, 09:20 AM
#5
Protege Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 126
PS2 Graphics
For anyone complaining about the Graphics on the PS2, go invest some money, get a COMPONENT INPUT tv, go pay the $80 for the Monster cable, then check the game out again.
Funny thing is, ... they actually add MORE to the background of the game. For example, in the 2nd to last turn of Seattle right before you go down the straightaway for pit, there are arrows against the wall telling you which way to go. With just the regular cable (composite or s-video) you get static arrows. With the component cable, they actually alternately blink.
Funny thing is, ... they actually add MORE to the background of the game. For example, in the 2nd to last turn of Seattle right before you go down the straightaway for pit, there are arrows against the wall telling you which way to go. With just the regular cable (composite or s-video) you get static arrows. With the component cable, they actually alternately blink.
June-20th-2002, 09:59 AM
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: PA
Posts: 2,339
Re: PS2 Graphics
Originally posted by Arkos
For anyone complaining about the Graphics on the PS2, go invest some money, get a COMPONENT INPUT tv, go pay the $80 for the Monster cable, then check the game out again.
Funny thing is, ... they actually add MORE to the background of the game. For example, in the 2nd to last turn of Seattle right before you go down the straightaway for pit, there are arrows against the wall telling you which way to go. With just the regular cable (composite or s-video) you get static arrows. With the component cable, they actually alternately blink.
For anyone complaining about the Graphics on the PS2, go invest some money, get a COMPONENT INPUT tv, go pay the $80 for the Monster cable, then check the game out again.
Funny thing is, ... they actually add MORE to the background of the game. For example, in the 2nd to last turn of Seattle right before you go down the straightaway for pit, there are arrows against the wall telling you which way to go. With just the regular cable (composite or s-video) you get static arrows. With the component cable, they actually alternately blink.
GTA3 = Grand Theft Auto 3
GT3 = Gran Turismo 3
June-20th-2002, 11:41 AM
#8
No Boost? No Chance!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 758
Re: PS2 Graphics
Originally posted by Arkos
For anyone complaining about the Graphics on the PS2, go invest some money, get a COMPONENT INPUT tv, go pay the $80 for the Monster cable, then check the game out again.
Funny thing is, ... they actually add MORE to the background of the game. For example, in the 2nd to last turn of Seattle right before you go down the straightaway for pit, there are arrows against the wall telling you which way to go. With just the regular cable (composite or s-video) you get static arrows. With the component cable, they actually alternately blink.
For anyone complaining about the Graphics on the PS2, go invest some money, get a COMPONENT INPUT tv, go pay the $80 for the Monster cable, then check the game out again.
Funny thing is, ... they actually add MORE to the background of the game. For example, in the 2nd to last turn of Seattle right before you go down the straightaway for pit, there are arrows against the wall telling you which way to go. With just the regular cable (composite or s-video) you get static arrows. With the component cable, they actually alternately blink.
June-20th-2002, 11:44 AM
#9
Ha-ho
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 166
Re: PS2 Graphics
Originally posted by Arkos
For anyone complaining about the Graphics on the PS2, go invest some money, get a COMPONENT INPUT tv, go pay the $80 for the Monster cable, then check the game out again.
Funny thing is, ... they actually add MORE to the background of the game. For example, in the 2nd to last turn of Seattle right before you go down the straightaway for pit, there are arrows against the wall telling you which way to go. With just the regular cable (composite or s-video) you get static arrows. With the component cable, they actually alternately blink.
For anyone complaining about the Graphics on the PS2, go invest some money, get a COMPONENT INPUT tv, go pay the $80 for the Monster cable, then check the game out again.
Funny thing is, ... they actually add MORE to the background of the game. For example, in the 2nd to last turn of Seattle right before you go down the straightaway for pit, there are arrows against the wall telling you which way to go. With just the regular cable (composite or s-video) you get static arrows. With the component cable, they actually alternately blink.
June-20th-2002, 12:06 PM
#10
WiCky=))
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 883
I thought the graphics in the PC version of GTA3were the same as the PS2 version? Well, considering a decent videocard powers the game.
Anyways, I find the control setup on the PC much more to my liking since the functions do not have to be bunched up, and you also get to use to mouse to look at the complexity of the world. Much easier and less frustrating than with the PS controller.
Anyways, I find the control setup on the PC much more to my liking since the functions do not have to be bunched up, and you also get to use to mouse to look at the complexity of the world. Much easier and less frustrating than with the PS controller.
June-20th-2002, 12:12 PM
#11
No Boost? No Chance!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 758
Originally posted by leungwingkei
I thought the graphics in the PC version of GTA3were the same as the PS2 version? Well, considering a decent videocard powers the game.
I thought the graphics in the PC version of GTA3were the same as the PS2 version? Well, considering a decent videocard powers the game.
June-20th-2002, 12:20 PM
#12
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: PA
Posts: 2,339
My copy ran pretty slow on my PC. It's probably the first game that I've tried (don't do a lot of gaming) that didn't run well even at 800X600... Oh well, I guess I just have to get some new ****.
The quality for inputs goes composite -> s-video -> component. I'd like to get the monster cable for my PS2, but $80 is really steep just for the video connections
Yea, Vice is going to be hot ****... Did you notice that they had a motorcycle on the cover for it?????
100% is unthinkably good... Does that include all the hidden packages and stuff? I made it over to staunton island, and the missions are a lot tougher than they were on Portland. Hell, I can't even find the bridge half the time to get back over there!!! hehehe....
The quality for inputs goes composite -> s-video -> component. I'd like to get the monster cable for my PS2, but $80 is really steep just for the video connections
Yea, Vice is going to be hot ****... Did you notice that they had a motorcycle on the cover for it?????
100% is unthinkably good... Does that include all the hidden packages and stuff? I made it over to staunton island, and the missions are a lot tougher than they were on Portland. Hell, I can't even find the bridge half the time to get back over there!!! hehehe....
June-20th-2002, 12:41 PM
#15
No Boost? No Chance!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 758
Originally posted by SedanMan
Actually the graphics look just as good if not better than on the PS2. Problem is, you need a REALLY good video card
Actually the graphics look just as good if not better than on the PS2. Problem is, you need a REALLY good video card