DX First gen vs. 2000 Si
#35
Originally posted by Tonyroma1
I have a SOHC DX 1st gen and I think it's a LOT quicker than most of the people on these forums give it credit for. I'm not saying that he wouldn't get beat by a 2000 Si (he porbably would, esp. with an automatic) but it bugs me when people are like "well OF COURSE he's gonna lose, he has a sohc!" How much of a HP difference are we really talking between SOHC and DOHC?? not too much!
I have a SOHC DX 1st gen and I think it's a LOT quicker than most of the people on these forums give it credit for. I'm not saying that he wouldn't get beat by a 2000 Si (he porbably would, esp. with an automatic) but it bugs me when people are like "well OF COURSE he's gonna lose, he has a sohc!" How much of a HP difference are we really talking between SOHC and DOHC?? not too much!
#36
Hmmm....bs huh?
Originally posted by Dayv
http://www.dcsports.com/Dynosi.html
Aren't the hp and torque curves supposed to intersect at 5252 RPM?
hp = (torque x RPM)/5252
That dyno plot looks like
http://www.dcsports.com/Dynosi.html
Aren't the hp and torque curves supposed to intersect at 5252 RPM?
hp = (torque x RPM)/5252
That dyno plot looks like
#37
Originally posted by Dayv
http://www.dcsports.com/Dynosi.html
Aren't the hp and torque curves supposed to intersect at 5252 RPM?
hp = (torque x RPM)/5252
That dyno plot looks like
http://www.dcsports.com/Dynosi.html
Aren't the hp and torque curves supposed to intersect at 5252 RPM?
hp = (torque x RPM)/5252
That dyno plot looks like
and if you notice on that dyno, it made like 130whp stock, its rated at 160 hp / flywheel
#39
Originally posted by Patio
its called vtec, if you ever drove an Si, I have, it pulls pretty nicely in the upper RPMs, VTEC kinda feels like a tiny shot of nitrous
and if you notice on that dyno, it made like 130whp stock, its rated at 160 hp / flywheel
its called vtec, if you ever drove an Si, I have, it pulls pretty nicely in the upper RPMs, VTEC kinda feels like a tiny shot of nitrous
and if you notice on that dyno, it made like 130whp stock, its rated at 160 hp / flywheel
This is true on any car, from Geo Metros to F1 to top fuel drag cars.
I reiterate, that dyno plot is bullshit.
#40
Hmmm you may have a point....
If of course you paid attention. Your bs flag is not valid according to the formula you posted. You see, you are absolutely right about the formula canceling out at 5252. HP should be equal to torque. However, if you paid attention to the plotting, they do match. Red dotted line indecates stock torque, which at 5252 is at about 108. And the solid red line denotes hp at about 108. Its probably a good idea check what your talking about before you plant your bs flag. The dyno is valid. Since we are looking at the hp curve you have to pay attention to all the factor. Especially before you make a "bs" smart remark.
Last edited by P-R-O-T-E-G-E; February-27th-2003 at 02:20 PM.
#41
My appologies.
I didn't notice that they were using different scales for the hp and torque when I first looked at it yesterday, and made the assumption that they did use the same scale as they do in most of the dyno plots I have seen, for the sake of easier readability. However, VTEC and 8000 RPM redlines aren't correct explainations for the way that plot looks (as far as the not graphically intersecting at 5252), so don't act like you knew all along either.
I might come off as a smart *** sometimes and I don't mean to, but I'll be the first to admit it when I'm wrong.
I didn't notice that they were using different scales for the hp and torque when I first looked at it yesterday, and made the assumption that they did use the same scale as they do in most of the dyno plots I have seen, for the sake of easier readability. However, VTEC and 8000 RPM redlines aren't correct explainations for the way that plot looks (as far as the not graphically intersecting at 5252), so don't act like you knew all along either.
I might come off as a smart *** sometimes and I don't mean to, but I'll be the first to admit it when I'm wrong.
#42
Agreed
I agree it took me a while to figure what was going on with that. I knew that the si had 160. I didn't know wether it was crank or wheel. Im glad that you handled this the way you did and didn't get assholish;makes me feel alot bettter about the whole forum deal. We all after all are here for the same reasons, to help each other, to provide advice, to correct, and enjoy our proteges!!! Understandable mistake.
I don't think that the protege can beat the si, however Im not to positive on the specs on the 1st gen protege's. Wtih the old emission standards and production capabilities of the 80's/early 90's, these =cars have potential to be alot faster than most expect.
I don't think that the protege can beat the si, however Im not to positive on the specs on the 1st gen protege's. Wtih the old emission standards and production capabilities of the 80's/early 90's, these =cars have potential to be alot faster than most expect.
#43
Re: Agreed
Originally posted by P-R-O-T-E-G-E
I don't think that the protege can beat the si, however Im not to positive on the specs on the 1st gen protege's. Wtih the old emission standards and production capabilities of the 80's/early 90's, these =cars have potential to be alot faster than most expect.
I don't think that the protege can beat the si, however Im not to positive on the specs on the 1st gen protege's. Wtih the old emission standards and production capabilities of the 80's/early 90's, these =cars have potential to be alot faster than most expect.
Civic Si's are not bad little cars. I'm not a Honda fan, but if someone gave me a deal on one I'd take it. People make fun of Hondas for their lack of torque, but look at how flat that torque curve is on the Si.
#44
That was prob the best post ever.. i wish all people on this board solved problems like that . Including myself. Def stock vrs stock a si civic will win. Or atleast should win.but they payed like 15grand more than u so come on now ...Jon
#45
I'll put it this way;
2000 Honda Civic SI
1.6L 160HP
V-TEC Engine
Redline 7600RPM's
Curb Weight 2600lbs
1993 Mazda Protege
1.8L 115HP
Redline 6400RPM's
Curb Weight 2445lbs
YOU MAKE THE CALL
2000 Honda Civic SI
1.6L 160HP
V-TEC Engine
Redline 7600RPM's
Curb Weight 2600lbs
1993 Mazda Protege
1.8L 115HP
Redline 6400RPM's
Curb Weight 2445lbs
YOU MAKE THE CALL