Racing Stories Race anyone lately (Mazda3Club.com does not endorse Street Racing)

DX First gen vs. 2000 Si

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old February-26th-2003, 09:05 PM
  #31  
Registered User
 
itzkcatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,130
itzkcatz is on a distinguished road
Yeah ive walked on a few dx proteges since i bought my car. (when it had a good clutch). And im not gonna beat a si civic anytime soon...Jon
itzkcatz is offline  
Old February-26th-2003, 10:19 PM
  #32  
 
TheLastMarauder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Alabama...
Posts: 195
TheLastMarauder is on a distinguished road
I think that race depends a lot on the color of the Protege.
TheLastMarauder is offline  
Old February-26th-2003, 10:32 PM
  #33  
Registered User
 
itzkcatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,130
itzkcatz is on a distinguished road
Ive found teal to be a quick color..Jon
itzkcatz is offline  
Old February-26th-2003, 10:57 PM
  #34  
formerly chastan
 
UCSBgeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: California, USA
Posts: 2,350
UCSBgeek is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by itzkcatz
Ive found teal to be a quick color..Jon
Dave will have speed yellow pretty soon
UCSBgeek is offline  
Old February-26th-2003, 11:02 PM
  #35  
The beige beast!
 
sweetprotege93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Mt. Pleasant, NC
Posts: 300
sweetprotege93 is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by Tonyroma1
I have a SOHC DX 1st gen and I think it's a LOT quicker than most of the people on these forums give it credit for. I'm not saying that he wouldn't get beat by a 2000 Si (he porbably would, esp. with an automatic) but it bugs me when people are like "well OF COURSE he's gonna lose, he has a sohc!" How much of a HP difference are we really talking between SOHC and DOHC?? not too much!
I used to have a '93 DX and now I have a '93 LX. There is a pretty significant difference between the two. I'm talkin' about when my LX was stock... right when I got it I noticed that it felt a lot faster than the DX. It kept up with my friends cars a lot better too!
sweetprotege93 is offline  
Old February-27th-2003, 06:52 AM
  #36  
Protege Newbie
 
P-R-O-T-E-G-E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 33
P-R-O-T-E-G-E is on a distinguished road
Hmmm....bs huh?

Originally posted by Dayv
http://www.dcsports.com/Dynosi.html

Aren't the hp and torque curves supposed to intersect at 5252 RPM?

hp = (torque x RPM)/5252

That dyno plot looks like
Not when the the redline on the car is close to 8000rpm. Torque and hp are going to intersect at different points on the line. Or did you forget about the high rpm difference. Its one of very few that redlines that high. But the BS flag can now happily burn in effigy!!!
P-R-O-T-E-G-E is offline  
Old February-27th-2003, 08:24 AM
  #37  
got boost? HELL NO!!!!!
 
Patio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Houston, TX <):)
Posts: 385
Patio is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by Dayv
http://www.dcsports.com/Dynosi.html

Aren't the hp and torque curves supposed to intersect at 5252 RPM?

hp = (torque x RPM)/5252

That dyno plot looks like
its called vtec, if you ever drove an Si, I have, it pulls pretty nicely in the upper RPMs, VTEC kinda feels like a tiny shot of nitrous


and if you notice on that dyno, it made like 130whp stock, its rated at 160 hp / flywheel
Patio is offline  
Old February-27th-2003, 08:45 AM
  #38  
Protege Newbie
 
P-R-O-T-E-G-E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 33
P-R-O-T-E-G-E is on a distinguished road
Possible statement retraction

Hmmm...you may have a point. So here is my new question which go's along with my old question: Do dyno test show crank hp or Whp?
P-R-O-T-E-G-E is offline  
Old February-27th-2003, 11:16 AM
  #39  
Protege Newbie
 
Dayv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Oxford, OH
Posts: 12
Dayv is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by Patio
its called vtec, if you ever drove an Si, I have, it pulls pretty nicely in the upper RPMs, VTEC kinda feels like a tiny shot of nitrous


and if you notice on that dyno, it made like 130whp stock, its rated at 160 hp / flywheel
It has nothing to do with VTEC or high revs. All dynometers directly measure torque, not horsepower. Horsepower is derrived using the formula I posted above from the torque that is observed at any given RPM. When RPM = 5252 it cancels out of the equation and hp = torque, thus the curves always have an intersection @ 5252 RPM.

This is true on any car, from Geo Metros to F1 to top fuel drag cars.

I reiterate, that dyno plot is bullshit.
Dayv is offline  
Old February-27th-2003, 01:59 PM
  #40  
Protege Newbie
 
P-R-O-T-E-G-E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 33
P-R-O-T-E-G-E is on a distinguished road
Hmmm you may have a point....

If of course you paid attention. Your bs flag is not valid according to the formula you posted. You see, you are absolutely right about the formula canceling out at 5252. HP should be equal to torque. However, if you paid attention to the plotting, they do match. Red dotted line indecates stock torque, which at 5252 is at about 108. And the solid red line denotes hp at about 108. Its probably a good idea check what your talking about before you plant your bs flag. The dyno is valid. Since we are looking at the hp curve you have to pay attention to all the factor. Especially before you make a "bs" smart remark.

Last edited by P-R-O-T-E-G-E; February-27th-2003 at 02:20 PM.
P-R-O-T-E-G-E is offline  
Old February-27th-2003, 04:15 PM
  #41  
Protege Newbie
 
Dayv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Oxford, OH
Posts: 12
Dayv is on a distinguished road
My appologies.

I didn't notice that they were using different scales for the hp and torque when I first looked at it yesterday, and made the assumption that they did use the same scale as they do in most of the dyno plots I have seen, for the sake of easier readability. However, VTEC and 8000 RPM redlines aren't correct explainations for the way that plot looks (as far as the not graphically intersecting at 5252), so don't act like you knew all along either.

I might come off as a smart *** sometimes and I don't mean to, but I'll be the first to admit it when I'm wrong.
Dayv is offline  
Old February-28th-2003, 02:50 AM
  #42  
Protege Newbie
 
P-R-O-T-E-G-E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 33
P-R-O-T-E-G-E is on a distinguished road
Agreed

I agree it took me a while to figure what was going on with that. I knew that the si had 160. I didn't know wether it was crank or wheel. Im glad that you handled this the way you did and didn't get assholish;makes me feel alot bettter about the whole forum deal. We all after all are here for the same reasons, to help each other, to provide advice, to correct, and enjoy our proteges!!! Understandable mistake.

I don't think that the protege can beat the si, however Im not to positive on the specs on the 1st gen protege's. Wtih the old emission standards and production capabilities of the 80's/early 90's, these =cars have potential to be alot faster than most expect.
P-R-O-T-E-G-E is offline  
Old February-28th-2003, 11:43 AM
  #43  
Protege Newbie
 
Dayv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Oxford, OH
Posts: 12
Dayv is on a distinguished road
Re: Agreed

Originally posted by P-R-O-T-E-G-E
I don't think that the protege can beat the si, however Im not to positive on the specs on the 1st gen protege's. Wtih the old emission standards and production capabilities of the 80's/early 90's, these =cars have potential to be alot faster than most expect.
~Stock vs. ~stock, no way in hell unless you are racing for a very short distance or a very bad driver. To compete with a stock Si, I'd say you'd have to have enough mods to drop at least a second of a 1st gen Protege's (really any Protege's) ET. That is easier said than done, but it can be done. Most Si's that are going to want to race are not going to be stock, maybe ~stock, but not stock. In any given town there are going to be more Civics running 14's that Proteges running 15's. So, the 1st gen is going to need a little more help to keep up. It's not imposible though.

Civic Si's are not bad little cars. I'm not a Honda fan, but if someone gave me a deal on one I'd take it. People make fun of Hondas for their lack of torque, but look at how flat that torque curve is on the Si.
Dayv is offline  
Old February-28th-2003, 12:46 PM
  #44  
Registered User
 
itzkcatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,130
itzkcatz is on a distinguished road
That was prob the best post ever.. i wish all people on this board solved problems like that . Including myself. Def stock vrs stock a si civic will win. Or atleast should win.but they payed like 15grand more than u so come on now ...Jon
itzkcatz is offline  
Old March-19th-2003, 12:49 PM
  #45  
half import half domestic
 
project626's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 184
project626 is on a distinguished road
I'll put it this way;

2000 Honda Civic SI
1.6L 160HP
V-TEC Engine
Redline 7600RPM's
Curb Weight 2600lbs



1993 Mazda Protege
1.8L 115HP
Redline 6400RPM's
Curb Weight 2445lbs



YOU MAKE THE CALL
project626 is offline  


Quick Reply: DX First gen vs. 2000 Si



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:58 AM.