Forced Induction/Nitrous Technical discussions for all power adders - turbos, superchargers, NOS

2.0l TT?!?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 4, 2002 | 11:50 PM
  #1  
TrexPro5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Ive got that funny feelin
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 291
From: Columbus, Oh
TrexPro5 is on a distinguished road
2.0l TT?!?!

Okay, I was thinking the other day. The fastest 4 door sedan (the last I heard) was some Jaguar, Dual Supercharged V8. If Im correct, it was two small superchargers that added the hp. Im wondering if two small turbos would be benifical to the 2.0l FS engine. I know just 1 t3 or t4 would be fine, but I was thinking 2 T-25's maybe. Still, Turbo lag is a bitch but I was just thinking at 3am... who knows? Anybody care to help out this dreaming fool?

Doh, might wanna move this to the Forced Induction Spot, sorry didnt see it.

Last edited by TrexPro5; Apr 4, 2002 at 11:52 PM.
Old Apr 4, 2002 | 11:55 PM
  #2  
JustinMP3's Avatar
Super Ninja
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 413
From: Goldsboro NC
JustinMP3 is on a distinguished road
I am not sure If I know what I am talking about but wouldnt you, well if you could have to off set the size of the turbo. (small turbo for takeoff, larger turbo for higher speeds and RPMs) well I don't know but it sounds right. Any different views?
Old Apr 5, 2002 | 05:42 AM
  #3  
Brubeck's Avatar
Protege Enthusiast
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 326
From: New Jersey
Brubeck is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by PseudoRealityX
the reason you use 2 superchargers or turbo chargers on a V engine is because you have 2 banks of cylinders, and it would be too hard to build a good manifold to make them into one big turbo.
Oh good... that would explain why the RX7 has TTs... on a Rotary engine.

I'm not so sure about this... I was talking about this with someone who is trouble-shooting their RX7 (were having a wastegate problem). I don't know much about TT or Turbo in general, so he sent me some schematics etc, and it seemed like the TTs were in-line. And anyway, they aren't supposed to kick in at the same time. From how it was explained, the *secondary* turbo on the RX7 is a little smaller than the *primary*
Old Apr 5, 2002 | 06:28 AM
  #4  
Brubeck's Avatar
Protege Enthusiast
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 326
From: New Jersey
Brubeck is on a distinguished road
OK, now I'm on the same page with you...
Old Apr 6, 2002 | 01:45 AM
  #5  
Installshield's Avatar
Use this to install stuff
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,069
From: State College, PA
Installshield is on a distinguished road
Small correction

the M5 is faster than the XJR I believe...

Sorry, not trying to be a dick.

Last edited by Installshield; Apr 6, 2002 at 01:50 AM.
Old Apr 8, 2002 | 03:27 AM
  #6  
TrexPro5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Ive got that funny feelin
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 291
From: Columbus, Oh
TrexPro5 is on a distinguished road
lol

hehe np, Im not sure... but all I know is that Jag is bad ***... I would love to have a dual supercharger system.
Old Apr 9, 2002 | 02:36 AM
  #7  
Makaveli's Avatar
Likwidated
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,159
From: Canada (formerly Yugoslavia)
Makaveli is on a distinguished road
http://www.race-cars.com/carsales/ot...1/dtpx01ss.htm

That's a twin supercharged DeTomaso Pantera

looks sweeeeeet

600 hp to justify the big spoiler hehe
Old Apr 9, 2002 | 02:38 AM
  #8  
Makaveli's Avatar
Likwidated
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,159
From: Canada (formerly Yugoslavia)
Makaveli is on a distinguished road
a picture of it




Look at that @$$
Old Apr 9, 2002 | 08:35 PM
  #9  
kc5zom's Avatar
Certified Sick Individual
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,141
From: Houston, TX.
kc5zom is on a distinguished road
The Jaguar XJR and XKR just have a single supercharger. Audi uses a pretty interesting Biturbo setup (their words not mine). They use two small turbos (each feeding a bank of cylinders) instead of one big turbo. The two small turbos spool up faster than the big turbo. This is the system they use on the S4. Truth be told the XJR and XKR are not that fast. They both 0-60 in the mid 5's and make 370HP (stock is 280 or 290) each. They are hampered by their automatic transmissions and high weight. But that is fine because they are the most comfortable cars I have ever sat in. The new S-Type R has a 400HP supercharged engine. It is supposed to be the performance king at Jaguar for awhile (they also used to make the XJ220 or something like that but it was not for US sale). I honestly can't think of any engines that use a dual supercharger setup. I know the RX-7 used two turbos in series (can't feed two different banks of cylinders on that one). You would have to do a series setup on the Protege unless you wanted to make a really creative intake system (feed 2 cylinders off of each turbo). I don't think that would work too well without some extreme engine modifications.

An interesting question would be what is the fastest sedan made. Maybe one of the AMG Mercedes models. Definitely something imported.

Last edited by kc5zom; Apr 9, 2002 at 08:38 PM.
Old Apr 9, 2002 | 09:24 PM
  #10  
GNO's Avatar
GNO
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 381
From: Des Moines, IA
GNO is on a distinguished road
I don't know of any stock vehicles with dual superchargers. But I've seen a few V8 powered cars with an eaton on each bank.
Old Apr 9, 2002 | 11:12 PM
  #11  
kc5zom's Avatar
Certified Sick Individual
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,141
From: Houston, TX.
kc5zom is on a distinguished road
And the difference between sequential and series is?
Old Apr 10, 2002 | 01:39 AM
  #12  
Installshield's Avatar
Use this to install stuff
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,069
From: State College, PA
Installshield is on a distinguished road
I know this has nothing to do with the thread but....

Originally posted by kc5zom


An interesting question would be what is the fastest sedan made. Maybe one of the AMG Mercedes models. Definitely something imported.
The BMW M5 is said to be that fastest Sedan ever made. I heard that it even edged out the new Jag Type S-R. I have never ridden in a M5 or any of those fast Jags, so I am only magazine racing. The AMG E55 (Mercedes) is also stupid fast, and the coupe version of that is faster than an M5 i think (but coupes aren't sedans obviously)

All of those 350+ hp sedans are so close in speed that any one of them would make me happy. My favorite is the M5 though because BMWs supsensions turn me on. A family sedan that can run with a corvette, beating it to pick up groceries and kids from soccer practice, would be pretty cool

Last edited by Installshield; Apr 10, 2002 at 01:47 AM.
Old Apr 10, 2002 | 01:54 AM
  #13  
Makaveli's Avatar
Likwidated
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,159
From: Canada (formerly Yugoslavia)
Makaveli is on a distinguished road
Guys, that car that I mentioned had two superchargers!!!

DeTomaso Pantera


Fastest sedan is M5 I think. Not sure though about the SL600 that is supposed to come out soon from Benz. It'll be a V12 with 400 hp I think. The SL500 does a 4.2 0-100 I think.
So who cares if they're not sedans, they're luxury coupes that got a hardtop that retracts automatically in like 5 seconds
Old Apr 10, 2002 | 02:21 AM
  #14  
Installshield's Avatar
Use this to install stuff
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,069
From: State College, PA
Installshield is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by Makaveli



The SL500 does a 4.2 0-100 I think.
You mean Kilometers per hour right? A Porsche GT-2 does 0-100 mph in like 8.1s which I believe is the fastest street legal car made acceleration wise.

I just realized that If we pulled up next to a GT-2 in our cars, he would hit 100 mph most likely before we would hit 60. I wonder how many car lengths that is?
Old Apr 10, 2002 | 04:06 AM
  #15  
Makaveli's Avatar
Likwidated
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,159
From: Canada (formerly Yugoslavia)
Makaveli is on a distinguished road
yeah, either 0-100 km/h or 0-60 mph..... forgot which one as they differ slightly........

By the time that the GT-2 does the quarter mile, we would be at the 80 m mark I think......



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:45 AM.