3rd gen Engine/Drivetrain Engine/Drivetrain Modification Discussions for 1999-2003 Models Only (BJ chassis)

W.O.M.P. Supercharger for 2.0L proteges

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 19, 2005 | 08:15 AM
  #751  
Rism's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 143
From: NY
Rism is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by Roddimus Prime
200whp is a safe bet I'd say...I wont be dissappointed with 180-190whp though...would you?
I dont, but my tranny might :P

Last edited by Rism; Apr 19, 2005 at 08:26 AM.
Old Apr 19, 2005 | 08:30 AM
  #752  
Roddimus Prime's Avatar
Thread Starter
The man behind the mask
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,572
From: Birmingham, AL
Roddimus Prime is on a distinguished road
i guess you've missed all the posts about hp vs torque and what causes problems in trannys.

torque is the problem and this blower produces very little torque (in comparison)
Old Apr 19, 2005 | 08:32 AM
  #753  
Rism's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 143
From: NY
Rism is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by Roddimus Prime
i guess you've missed all the posts about hp vs torque and what causes problems in trannys.

torque is the problem and this blower produces very little torque (in comparison)
HAHA oops
Just woke up, forgot about that
Old Apr 19, 2005 | 04:31 PM
  #754  
Anarchistchiken's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 661
From: Seattle, WA
Anarchistchiken is on a distinguished road
Haha, out partying hard last night? Just woke up at 1pm? I wish I could do that.

I won't be dissapointed with 190, cause I'll still tell people it's 200. And the drivetrain loss on our trannies (manual) is about 25-30%, so that's about 250 crank, which is plenty to brag about on a stock 130 hp car
Old Apr 19, 2005 | 04:41 PM
  #755  
Rism's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 143
From: NY
Rism is on a distinguished road
Power loss through the drivetrain is about 30hp.
Old Apr 19, 2005 | 05:03 PM
  #756  
Anarchistchiken's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 661
From: Seattle, WA
Anarchistchiken is on a distinguished road
30 hp from 130 at the crank. It's a percentage loss, not a constant number. If that were true than 800 hp mustangs would have 760 whp instead of 550 whp. Think about it.
Old Apr 19, 2005 | 07:27 PM
  #757  
scotty878's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,105
From: Lincroft, NJ
scotty878 is on a distinguished road
200WHP at 4.5psi sounds DAMN good to me! Have you thought of looking into different pulleys to sell for more psi? I know your going to have different ones for manual and automatic but I'm talking ones for people with forged motors and such to run BIG numbers? J/W because im curious to see how far these numbers can go.
Old Apr 19, 2005 | 07:46 PM
  #758  
Roddimus Prime's Avatar
Thread Starter
The man behind the mask
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,572
From: Birmingham, AL
Roddimus Prime is on a distinguished road
oh I can have any pulley you want made. Thats not the problem...the problem is finding someone who wants to push the limits of the blower. I've said ti before but I'll provide as much air as you guys think you can support with fuel and engine strength.
Old Apr 19, 2005 | 07:52 PM
  #759  
Rism's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 143
From: NY
Rism is on a distinguished road
1 question:
Does the PSI increase with a smaller diameter or larger diameter pulley?
Old Apr 19, 2005 | 08:09 PM
  #760  
Roddimus Prime's Avatar
Thread Starter
The man behind the mask
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,572
From: Birmingham, AL
Roddimus Prime is on a distinguished road
smaller pulley = more boost
Old Apr 20, 2005 | 07:59 AM
  #761  
hughes412's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,099
From: Austin, Tx
hughes412 is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by Anarchistchiken
30 hp from 130 at the crank. It's a percentage loss, not a constant number. If that were true than 800 hp mustangs would have 760 whp instead of 550 whp. Think about it.

Just in case you didn't know rear wheel drive cars have a greater loss because it has farther to go to get to the ground. But if he has 550 whp then he doesn't have 760 crank, more like 600-620.
Old Apr 20, 2005 | 08:13 AM
  #762  
Roddimus Prime's Avatar
Thread Starter
The man behind the mask
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,572
From: Birmingham, AL
Roddimus Prime is on a distinguished road
If I'm not mistaken I believe I did the math and we 5spd proteges have about 23% loss through the drivetrain. So if you add that 23% back to my 158whp figure you get 194bhp
Old Apr 22, 2005 | 12:43 PM
  #763  
dudeondacouch's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 687
From: Ft. Sill, Oklahoma
dudeondacouch is on a distinguished road
Actually, no...
I think you added 23% of 158...

you should've been subtracting 23% of X (where x is fwhp)

or
158=x-.23x
158=.77x

X=205.19...
Old Apr 22, 2005 | 01:04 PM
  #764  
Roddimus Prime's Avatar
Thread Starter
The man behind the mask
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,572
From: Birmingham, AL
Roddimus Prime is on a distinguished road
ah, you're right...my math is t3h sUx0r$.
Old Apr 22, 2005 | 01:06 PM
  #765  
nate0123's Avatar
Protegéphile
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,037
From: Washington, DC
nate0123 is on a distinguished road
I don't know if the "percentage" loss remains constant, but even so, 200+ at the crank sounds pretty nice



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:21 AM.