3rd gen Engine/Drivetrain Engine/Drivetrain Modification Discussions for 1999-2003 Models Only (BJ chassis)

Urethene motor mounts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old September-24th-2002, 04:35 PM
  #1  
Protege Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Radioflyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Huntsvill, AL
Posts: 40
Radioflyer is on a distinguished road
Urethene motor mounts

Anyone have urethene motor mounts on their P5 to tame the engine bounce?

Keep it between the paint...
Radioflyer is offline  
Old September-24th-2002, 10:38 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
CitizenPro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 210
CitizenPro is on a distinguished road
A service guy at my mazda dealership has them on his Protege sedan, and he recommended to not get them. I took a look at them with the car on, and it it makes the front bumper shake(vibrate). And on top of it a piece of it broke off! but maybe thats just his car
CitizenPro is offline  
Old September-27th-2002, 10:29 AM
  #3  
Protege Enthusiast
 
tester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: St. Albert, AB, Canada
Posts: 109
tester is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by CitizenPro
A service guy at my mazda dealership has them on his Protege sedan, and he recommended to not get them. I took a look at them with the car on, and it it makes the front bumper shake(vibrate). And on top of it a piece of it broke off! but maybe thats just his car
I put in the front mount only so far (rear is a bitch to do). I find the shifting much tighter with them on, and really like them. THe annoying part is that it does add more vibration, but only at idle is it noticable. My tradeoff is that I will never put the rear ones on, as the front ones make things tighter with the vibration still livable. I think if you put both on, the rattle would be unbearable.
I can only think that the top part of the urethane broke off if he overtightened the bolt, as otherwise it should not happen. Anyways, the edges do nothing anyways, its the urethane in the center portion that do all the work.
tester is offline  
Old September-27th-2002, 02:00 PM
  #4  
Protege Enthusiast
 
silver_p5_owner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Troy, Michigan
Posts: 186
silver_p5_owner is on a distinguished road
I think he meant a piece of the front bumber broke off?
silver_p5_owner is offline  
Old September-28th-2002, 02:10 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
CitizenPro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 210
CitizenPro is on a distinguished road
na, i meant a piece of the mount broke off. It was ok, but he still took it back to get another one.
CitizenPro is offline  
Old September-29th-2002, 04:16 PM
  #6  
Recreational Gynocolist
 
Farsyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 568
Farsyde is on a distinguished road
but see, all you are doing is transfering the vibration from the motor which is built to withstand it, to the rest of the car. Now I know the iron blcok is more suited to withstand the shake rattle and roll than the plastic parts in the rest of the car.
Farsyde is offline  
Old September-29th-2002, 07:32 PM
  #7  
Always Flippin The Game
 
LinuxRacr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 558
LinuxRacr is on a distinguished road
I say wait for the Mazdaspeed to come out, and then get the motor mounts for one of them. They are supposed to be a lot better.
LinuxRacr is offline  
Old September-30th-2002, 10:33 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
cyomega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 26
cyomega is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by Farsyde
but see, all you are doing is transfering the vibration from the motor which is built to withstand it, to the rest of the car. Now I know the iron blcok is more suited to withstand the shake rattle and roll than the plastic parts in the rest of the car.
This is partially incorrect.
When you rev your engine, it "leans" or "flexes" due to the change in RPM. This is more apparent when looking at the engine from the side of the car (i.e. looking at the pulleys). Have a friend sit in the car and rev it up from idle and you'll notice the block sort of tip toward the firewall. Urethane mounts stiffen up the engine in relation to the frame so that the engine flex doesn't occur relative to the PPF and the frame of the vehicle. This will reduce wheelhop when the tires are spinning and generally shorten engine response time. As a side effect, the natural vibration of the engine is no longer isolated from the rest of the car.
cyomega is offline  
Old September-30th-2002, 09:06 PM
  #9  
Recreational Gynocolist
 
Farsyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 568
Farsyde is on a distinguished road
isn't that what i said?? by "stiffining" the engine mounts you are not allowing the engine to lean or move as freely and will transfer the vibration to the rest of the car. This is in fact the reason the engine is mounted with a certain degree of play, otherwise the car ride would be too rough and would prolly make holding a cup of coffee in the cup holder rather interesting. Although-i can see the theraputic value of a full body massage.
Farsyde is offline  
Old October-1st-2002, 06:56 AM
  #10  
Protege Newbie
 
bad lucky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 5
bad lucky is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by Farsyde
isn't that what i said?? by "stiffining" the engine mounts you are not allowing the engine to lean or move as freely and will transfer the vibration to the rest of the car. This is in fact the reason the engine is mounted with a certain degree of play, otherwise the car ride would be too rough and would prolly make holding a cup of coffee in the cup holder rather interesting. Although-i can see the theraputic value of a full body massage.
to put it simply the technology of urethane mounts is basically for racing/pretty spirited driving and drivers that will accept the consequences for every little detail that will make the car faster, handle better, etc. it wasn't made for everyday "hold your cup of joe while you go to work kinda thing" that's why they use rubber and liquid filled motor mounts from the factory. hell, i've seen in japan another new technology of the various crazy ideas they have is a shock absorber type dampner that attaches one side to the engine and the other to the chassis.
bad lucky is offline  
Old October-1st-2002, 07:48 AM
  #11  
Banned
 
njaremka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Central New York
Posts: 1,241
njaremka is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by bad lucky


to put it simply the technology of urethane mounts is basically for racing/pretty spirited driving and drivers that will accept the consequences for every little detail that will make the car faster, handle better, etc. it wasn't made for everyday "hold your cup of joe while you go to work kinda thing" that's why they use rubber and liquid filled motor mounts from the factory. hell, i've seen in japan another new technology of the various crazy ideas they have is a shock absorber type dampner that attaches one side to the engine and the other to the chassis.
that's not really new, either. they call it a torque strap, and i know that cars from at least the 70's used 'em to control engine movement. and yes, the whole reason for making the motor mounts soft is so that the car will be as confortable to drive as possible, to appeal to as many people as possible, to sell as many cars as possible. the best handling responsive car would have solid motor mounts, spherical bushings in the suspension, and no rubber any where except the tires. but then, granny won't buy one because it will cause her dentures to fall out.
njaremka is offline  
Old October-30th-2002, 09:42 PM
  #12  
Protege Enthusiast
 
motorhead16v4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 67
motorhead16v4 is on a distinguished road
I hate my motor mounts. That is the first mod I wanted to do to my car. The sloppiness, combined with the nonlinear throttle (the computer "blips" the throttle when you push on the gas, fooling you into thinking you have more power than you really do), makes it hell in first gear in a parking lot. Anyone seen any hard rubber motor mounts? They make 'em for VW's, as a compromise between pitifully-floppy rubber and shake-your-fillings-out urethane. Hm, maybe Mazdas aren't cool enough yet.
motorhead16v4 is offline  
Old October-31st-2002, 06:57 AM
  #13  
Banned
 
njaremka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Central New York
Posts: 1,241
njaremka is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by motorhead16v4
I hate my motor mounts. That is the first mod I wanted to do to my car. The sloppiness, combined with the nonlinear throttle (the computer "blips" the throttle when you push on the gas, fooling you into thinking you have more power than you really do), makes it hell in first gear in a parking lot. Anyone seen any hard rubber motor mounts? They make 'em for VW's, as a compromise between pitifully-floppy rubber and shake-your-fillings-out urethane. Hm, maybe Mazdas aren't cool enough yet.
just replacing the front mount with the urethane one seems like a nice comprimise. it is easier to get to, also. the only drawback to that option from my view is this: they only sell them in pairs.
njaremka is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
suzoom
Mazda Service Info
22
May-4th-2021 04:30 PM
yelmp5zoomzoom
Parts For Sale or Wanted
9
March-23rd-2005 05:55 PM
eric1234
3rd gen Engine/Drivetrain
3
March-30th-2004 04:19 PM
jowettw
3rd gen Engine/Drivetrain
2
January-14th-2004 07:55 PM
Protege5online
Group Buys
2
December-8th-2003 01:46 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Urethene motor mounts



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:57 AM.